Rasa icon

Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

vs
2021.AI (GRACE) icon

2021.AI (GRACE)

Danish on-premise sovereign AI platform with built-in governance

Rasa
76%Strong
19/25
2021.AI (GRACE)
92%Excellent
23/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionRasa2021.AI (GRACE)
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
2021.AI (GRACE): Fully on-premise or air-gapped; data never leaves customer infrastructure
5/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
2021.AI (GRACE): Danish ApS under EU law; not subject to US jurisdiction
3/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
2021.AI (GRACE): On-premise deployment; customer has full control over all data
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
2021.AI (GRACE): ISO 27001 certified
2/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
2021.AI (GRACE): Proven in Danish public sector healthcare; designed for highest sovereignty requirements
4/5
5/5
Total Score
19/25
23/25

Best For

Rasa iconRasa

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (BaFin, ICO); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment.

2021.AI (GRACE) icon2021.AI (GRACE)

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

2021.AI (GRACE) vs Rasa: Trust & Compliance Comparison

2021.AI (GRACE) (2021.AI, DK) scores 23/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Danish on-premise sovereign AI platform with built-in governance. Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

2021.AI (GRACE) (5/5): Fully on-premise or air-gapped; data never leaves customer infrastructure
Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

2021.AI (GRACE) leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

2021.AI (GRACE) (5/5): Danish ApS under EU law; not subject to US jurisdiction
Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

2021.AI (GRACE) (5/5): On-premise deployment; customer has full control over all data
Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

#### Certifications

2021.AI (GRACE) leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

2021.AI (GRACE) (3/5): ISO 27001 certified
Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

#### Regulatory Fit

2021.AI (GRACE) leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

2021.AI (GRACE) (5/5): Proven in Danish public sector healthcare; designed for highest sovereignty requirements
Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification2021.AI (GRACE)Rasa
ISO 27001YesNo

Overall Verdict

2021.AI (GRACE) has a clear trust advantage, scoring 23/25 compared to Rasa's 19/25. 2021.AI (GRACE) particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Rasa or 2021.AI (GRACE)?

Rasa has a TrustKit score of 19/25 while 2021.AI (GRACE) scores 23/25. 2021.AI (GRACE) currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Rasa and 2021.AI (GRACE) compare on data residency?

Rasa scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.), while 2021.AI (GRACE) scores 5/5 (Fully on-premise or air-gapped; data never leaves customer infrastructure).

Are Rasa and 2021.AI (GRACE) GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Rasa has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and 2021.AI (GRACE) scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool