LightOn

Sovereign enterprise GenAI platform deployed on-prem, air-gapped, or EU cloud

Agenta

Open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability — Berlin-based

LightOn

Excellent

22/25

Agenta

Strong

20/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionLightOnAgenta

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

LightOn: Deploys on-premise, in customer VPC, or air-gapped on EU infrastructure, so data never leaves the customer's own security perimeter. Strongest possible residency posture.

Agenta: Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.

5/5

Deploys on-premise, in customer VPC, or air-gapped on EU infrastructure, so data never leaves the customer's own security perimeter. Strongest possible residency posture.

5/5

Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

LightOn: French SA incorporated in France, listed on Euronext Growth Paris, with no US parent. Fully under EU/French jurisdiction.

Agenta: German GmbH, fully under EU law. Berlin-based with European investors (Antler, InReach). No US parent.

5/5

French SA incorporated in France, listed on Euronext Growth Paris, with no US parent. Fully under EU/French jurisdiction.

5/5

German GmbH, fully under EU law. Berlin-based with European investors (Antler, InReach). No US parent.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

LightOn: In-perimeter deployment means no customer data is sent out or used to train shared models, and retention is governed by the customer's own infrastructure. Scored 4 rather than 5 as public DPA/retention-control documentation is limited.

Agenta: Self-hosted gives complete control. Open-source code is auditable. No data used for training.

4/5

In-perimeter deployment means no customer data is sent out or used to train shared models, and retention is governed by the customer's own infrastructure. Scored 4 rather than 5 as public DPA/retention-control documentation is limited.

5/5

Self-hosted gives complete control. Open-source code is auditable. No data used for training.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

LightOn: Holds SOC 2 Type 1. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II are not confirmed in published sources, and ANSSI SecNumCloud appears to be a positioning goal rather than a confirmed qualification.

Agenta: No formal certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Expected at this early stage. Self-hosted model allows organisations to apply their own security controls.

3/5

Holds SOC 2 Type 1. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II are not confirmed in published sources, and ANSSI SecNumCloud appears to be a positioning goal rather than a confirmed qualification.

1/5

No formal certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Expected at this early stage. Self-hosted model allows organisations to apply their own security controls.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

LightOn: Purpose-built for regulated and sovereign EU buyers, with public-sector and defense/aerospace references (CNES, Safran, French tax authority) and GDPR/AI Act alignment.

Agenta: EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Strong sovereignty posture offset by lack of formal certifications. Best suited for teams that manage their own infrastructure and security.

5/5

Purpose-built for regulated and sovereign EU buyers, with public-sector and defense/aerospace references (CNES, Safran, French tax authority) and GDPR/AI Act alignment.

4/5

EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Strong sovereignty posture offset by lack of formal certifications. Best suited for teams that manage their own infrastructure and security.

Total Score

22/25

20/25

Best For

LightOn

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Agenta

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (CNIL, AMF); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Agenta vs LightOn: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Agenta (Agenta, DE) scores 20/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability — Berlin-based. LightOn (LightOn, FR) scores 22/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Sovereign enterprise GenAI platform deployed on-prem, air-gapped, or EU cloud.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

●Agenta (5/5): Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.

●LightOn (5/5): Deploys on-premise, in customer VPC, or air-gapped on EU infrastructure, so data never leaves the customer's own security perimeter. Strongest possible residency posture.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 5/5.

●Agenta (5/5): German GmbH, fully under EU law. Berlin-based with European investors (Antler, InReach). No US parent.

●LightOn (5/5): French SA incorporated in France, listed on Euronext Growth Paris, with no US parent. Fully under EU/French jurisdiction.

#### Data Retention & Training

Agenta leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Agenta (5/5): Self-hosted gives complete control. Open-source code is auditable. No data used for training.

●LightOn (4/5): In-perimeter deployment means no customer data is sent out or used to train shared models, and retention is governed by the customer's own infrastructure. Scored 4 rather than 5 as public DPA/retention-control documentation is limited.

#### Certifications

LightOn leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

●Agenta (1/5): No formal certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Expected at this early stage. Self-hosted model allows organisations to apply their own security controls.

●LightOn (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type 1. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II are not confirmed in published sources, and ANSSI SecNumCloud appears to be a positioning goal rather than a confirmed qualification.

#### Regulatory Fit

LightOn leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Agenta (4/5): EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Strong sovereignty posture offset by lack of formal certifications. Best suited for teams that manage their own infrastructure and security.

●LightOn (5/5): Purpose-built for regulated and sovereign EU buyers, with public-sector and defense/aerospace references (CNES, Safran, French tax authority) and GDPR/AI Act alignment.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	Agenta	LightOn
SOC 2 Type 1	No	Yes

Overall Verdict

LightOn has a clear trust advantage, scoring 22/25 compared to Agenta's 20/25. LightOn particularly excels in certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, LightOn or Agenta?

LightOn has a TrustKit score of 22/25 while Agenta scores 20/25. LightOn currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do LightOn and Agenta compare on data residency?

LightOn scores 5/5 for data residency (Deploys on-premise, in customer VPC, or air-gapped on EU infrastructure, so data never leaves the customer's own security perimeter. Strongest possible residency posture.), while Agenta scores 5/5 (Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.).

Are LightOn and Agenta GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. LightOn has a regulatory fit score of 5/5 and Agenta scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool