Windsurf (Codeium)

Agentic AI IDE and code assistant that understands your entire codebase

Amazon Q Developer

AWS-native AI assistant for software development and cloud operations

Windsurf (Codeium)

Moderate

13/25

Amazon Q Developer

Excellent

22/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionWindsurf (Codeium)Amazon Q Developer

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Windsurf (Codeium): Hosted product uses US cloud infrastructure. Enterprise self-hosted deployment allows EU data residency. Score reflects hosted product; self-hosted enterprise achieves a score of 5.

Amazon Q Developer: Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.

2/5

Hosted product uses US cloud infrastructure. Enterprise self-hosted deployment allows EU data residency. Score reflects hosted product; self-hosted enterprise achieves a score of 5.

5/5

Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Windsurf (Codeium): US incorporation, California jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. Enterprise DPA available. Self-hosted enterprise deployments remove US data processing dependency.

Amazon Q Developer: US company subject to US legal jurisdiction; however, AWS's extensive global compliance infrastructure mitigates many risks.

2/5

US incorporation, California jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. Enterprise DPA available. Self-hosted enterprise deployments remove US data processing dependency.

3/5

US company subject to US legal jurisdiction; however, AWS's extensive global compliance infrastructure mitigates many risks.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Windsurf (Codeium): Enterprise and paid tiers: code and prompts not used for shared model training. Telemetry controls available. Self-hosted deployments provide maximum control.

Amazon Q Developer: Code suggestions are not used to train models; strong data isolation at the enterprise level.

4/5

Enterprise and paid tiers: code and prompts not used for shared model training. Telemetry controls available. Self-hosted deployments provide maximum control.

4/5

Code suggestions are not used to train models; strong data isolation at the enterprise level.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Windsurf (Codeium): Holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Appropriate for an enterprise code assistant. ISO 27001 would further strengthen the posture for European enterprise procurement.

Amazon Q Developer: Inherits AWS's extensive certification portfolio including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and FedRAMP.

3/5

Holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Appropriate for an enterprise code assistant. ISO 27001 would further strengthen the posture for European enterprise procurement.

5/5

Inherits AWS's extensive certification portfolio including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and FedRAMP.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Windsurf (Codeium): Hosted product requires GDPR SCCs for EU deployment in regulated industries. Enterprise self-hosted option is well-suited for organisations with strict IP and data sovereignty requirements. EU-regulated industries should use self-hosted deployment path.

Amazon Q Developer: Excellent fit for regulated industries; FedRAMP authorized and suitable for US government workloads.

2/5

Hosted product requires GDPR SCCs for EU deployment in regulated industries. Enterprise self-hosted option is well-suited for organisations with strict IP and data sovereignty requirements. EU-regulated industries should use self-hosted deployment path.

5/5

Excellent fit for regulated industries; FedRAMP authorized and suitable for US government workloads.

Total Score

13/25

22/25

Best For

Windsurf (Codeium)

Best for organisations requiring broad certification coverage (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS); regulated industries (FedRAMP); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Amazon Q Developer

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Q Developer vs Windsurf (Codeium): Trust & Compliance Comparison

Amazon Q Developer (Amazon Web Services, US) scores 22/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. AWS-native AI assistant for software development and cloud operations. Windsurf (Codeium) (Codeium, US) scores 13/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Agentic AI IDE and code assistant that understands your entire codebase.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 2/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (5/5): Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.

●Windsurf (Codeium) (2/5): Hosted product uses US cloud infrastructure. Enterprise self-hosted deployment allows EU data residency. Score reflects hosted product; self-hosted enterprise achieves a score of 5.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Amazon Q Developer leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (3/5): US company subject to US legal jurisdiction; however, AWS's extensive global compliance infrastructure mitigates many risks.

●Windsurf (Codeium) (2/5): US incorporation, California jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. Enterprise DPA available. Self-hosted enterprise deployments remove US data processing dependency.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (4/5): Code suggestions are not used to train models; strong data isolation at the enterprise level.

●Windsurf (Codeium) (4/5): Enterprise and paid tiers: code and prompts not used for shared model training. Telemetry controls available. Self-hosted deployments provide maximum control.

#### Certifications

Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (5/5): Inherits AWS's extensive certification portfolio including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and FedRAMP.

●Windsurf (Codeium) (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Appropriate for an enterprise code assistant. ISO 27001 would further strengthen the posture for European enterprise procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 2/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (5/5): Excellent fit for regulated industries; FedRAMP authorized and suitable for US government workloads.

●Windsurf (Codeium) (2/5): Hosted product requires GDPR SCCs for EU deployment in regulated industries. Enterprise self-hosted option is well-suited for organisations with strict IP and data sovereignty requirements. EU-regulated industries should use self-hosted deployment path.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	Amazon Q Developer	Windsurf (Codeium)
FedRAMP	Yes	No
HIPAA	Yes	No
ISO 27001	Yes	No
PCI DSS	Yes	No
SOC 2 Type II	Yes	Yes

Overall Verdict

Amazon Q Developer has a clear trust advantage, scoring 22/25 compared to Windsurf (Codeium)'s 13/25. Amazon Q Developer particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Windsurf (Codeium) or Amazon Q Developer?

Windsurf (Codeium) has a TrustKit score of 13/25 while Amazon Q Developer scores 22/25. Amazon Q Developer currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Windsurf (Codeium) and Amazon Q Developer compare on data residency?

Windsurf (Codeium) scores 2/5 for data residency (Hosted product uses US cloud infrastructure. Enterprise self-hosted deployment allows EU data residency. Score reflects hosted product; self-hosted enterprise achieves a score of 5.), while Amazon Q Developer scores 5/5 (Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.).

Are Windsurf (Codeium) and Amazon Q Developer GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Windsurf (Codeium) has a regulatory fit score of 2/5 and Amazon Q Developer scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool