Greenhouse icon

Greenhouse

AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring

vs
Attio icon

Attio

London-based AI-native CRM built for modern B2B companies

Greenhouse
64%Moderate
16/25
Attio
80%Strong
20/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGreenhouseAttio
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Greenhouse: Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.
Attio: EU data residency (AWS eu-west-1) is the default for all plans — not an enterprise add-on
3/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Greenhouse: Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.
Attio: UK entity (England and Wales); UK GDPR jurisdiction; no US parent; post-Brexit UK adequacy decision in place
3/5
4/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Greenhouse: Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.
Attio: No training on CRM data; transparent about third-party AI services; DPA available for EU customers
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Greenhouse: Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.
Attio: SOC 2 Type II certified; ISO 27001 in progress as of early 2026
3/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Greenhouse: Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.
Attio: Excellent EU fit; EU residency by default, UK legal entity, SOC 2 — good for regulated European B2B sales teams
3/5
4/5
Total Score
16/25
20/25

Best For

Greenhouse iconGreenhouse

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (ICO, CNIL); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Attio iconAttio

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Detailed Comparison

Attio vs Greenhouse: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Attio (Attio, GB) scores 20/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. London-based AI-native CRM built for modern B2B companies. Greenhouse (Greenhouse Software, US) scores 16/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Attio leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Attio (5/5): EU data residency (AWS eu-west-1) is the default for all plans — not an enterprise add-on
Greenhouse (3/5): Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Attio leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Attio (4/5): UK entity (England and Wales); UK GDPR jurisdiction; no US parent; post-Brexit UK adequacy decision in place
Greenhouse (3/5): Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Attio (4/5): No training on CRM data; transparent about third-party AI services; DPA available for EU customers
Greenhouse (4/5): Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 3/5.

Attio (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; ISO 27001 in progress as of early 2026
Greenhouse (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.

#### Regulatory Fit

Attio leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Attio (4/5): Excellent EU fit; EU residency by default, UK legal entity, SOC 2 — good for regulated European B2B sales teams
Greenhouse (3/5): Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationAttioGreenhouse
ISO 27001NoYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Attio has a clear trust advantage, scoring 20/25 compared to Greenhouse's 16/25. Attio particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Greenhouse or Attio?

Greenhouse has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Attio scores 20/25. Attio currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Greenhouse and Attio compare on data residency?

Greenhouse scores 3/5 for data residency (Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.), while Attio scores 5/5 (EU data residency (AWS eu-west-1) is the default for all plans — not an enterprise add-on).

Are Greenhouse and Attio GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Greenhouse has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Attio scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool