Berget AI

Swedish sovereign AI inference platform with EU-only data residency

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems

Berget AI

Strong

20/25

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Strong

18/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionBerget AIAutoGen (Microsoft)

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Berget AI: All data processed and stored exclusively in Sweden. No US cloud dependency. EU-only infrastructure by design.

AutoGen (Microsoft): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

5/5

All data processed and stored exclusively in Sweden. No US cloud dependency. EU-only infrastructure by design.

5/5

MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Berget AI: Swedish incorporation under EU law. No US parent company, no CLOUD Act exposure. Full GDPR coverage as a matter of corporate law.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

5/5

Swedish incorporation under EU law. No US parent company, no CLOUD Act exposure. Full GDPR coverage as a matter of corporate law.

3/5

Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Berget AI: User data not used for model training. Platform runs open-source models on dedicated infrastructure. Early-stage company so retention policies are still maturing.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

4/5

User data not used for model training. Platform runs open-source models on dedicated infrastructure. Early-stage company so retention policies are still maturing.

5/5

Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Berget AI: NIS2 aligned and Schrems II compliant but no formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications yet. Expected for a seed-stage company.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

2/5

NIS2 aligned and Schrems II compliant but no formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications yet. Expected for a seed-stage company.

1/5

Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Berget AI: Strong fit for EU regulated industries needing sovereign AI inference. NIS2 alignment and EU-only data residency support public sector and financial services use cases.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

4/5

Strong fit for EU regulated industries needing sovereign AI inference. NIS2 alignment and EU-only data residency support public sector and financial services use cases.

4/5

Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

Total Score

20/25

18/25

Best For

Berget AI

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

AutoGen (Microsoft) vs Berget AI: Trust & Compliance Comparison

AutoGen (Microsoft) (Microsoft Research, US) scores 18/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems. Berget AI (Berget AI, SE) scores 20/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Swedish sovereign AI inference platform with EU-only data residency.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

●Berget AI (5/5): All data processed and stored exclusively in Sweden. No US cloud dependency. EU-only infrastructure by design.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Berget AI leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (3/5): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

●Berget AI (5/5): Swedish incorporation under EU law. No US parent company, no CLOUD Act exposure. Full GDPR coverage as a matter of corporate law.

#### Data Retention & Training

AutoGen (Microsoft) leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

●Berget AI (4/5): User data not used for model training. Platform runs open-source models on dedicated infrastructure. Early-stage company so retention policies are still maturing.

#### Certifications

Berget AI leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (1/5): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

●Berget AI (2/5): NIS2 aligned and Schrems II compliant but no formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications yet. Expected for a seed-stage company.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (4/5): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

●Berget AI (4/5): Strong fit for EU regulated industries needing sovereign AI inference. NIS2 alignment and EU-only data residency support public sector and financial services use cases.

Overall Verdict

Berget AI has a clear trust advantage, scoring 20/25 compared to AutoGen (Microsoft)'s 18/25. Berget AI particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Berget AI or AutoGen (Microsoft)?

Berget AI has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 18/25. Berget AI currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Berget AI and AutoGen (Microsoft) compare on data residency?

Berget AI scores 5/5 for data residency (All data processed and stored exclusively in Sweden. No US cloud dependency. EU-only infrastructure by design.), while AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 5/5 (MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.).

Are Berget AI and AutoGen (Microsoft) GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Berget AI has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool