AutoGen (Microsoft) icon

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems

vs
regolo.ai icon

regolo.ai

EU-sovereign, zero-retention LLM inference on green Italian datacentres

AutoGen (Microsoft)
72%Strong
18/25
regolo.ai
92%Excellent
23/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionAutoGen (Microsoft)regolo.ai
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
AutoGen (Microsoft): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.
regolo.ai: All inference runs exclusively in Seeweb's Italian (EU) datacentres on renewable energy, with no data leaving the EU. Explicit EU-only residency.
5/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
AutoGen (Microsoft): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.
regolo.ai: Operated by Seeweb S.r.l., an Italian company within the EU-listed DHH group, with no US parent. Fully under EU/Italian jurisdiction.
3/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
AutoGen (Microsoft): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.
regolo.ai: Explicit zero-data-retention architecture: prompts and outputs processed in memory and discarded, never stored, logged long-term, or used for training, with GDPR/DPA alignment.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
AutoGen (Microsoft): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.
regolo.ai: Inherits Seeweb's strong stack: ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 22301, 14001, 9001, plus CSA STAR Level 1, CISPE and ACN recognition. SOC 2 Type II is not published, so not a full 5.
1/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
AutoGen (Microsoft): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.
regolo.ai: Strong fit for most EU regulated industries via EU residency, zero retention, and broad ISO certification, suitable for buyers under the Italian Garante and other EU regulators; not yet sector-specific (e.g., no published BaFin/finance-specific attestations).
4/5
4/5
Total Score
18/25
23/25

Best For

AutoGen (Microsoft) iconAutoGen (Microsoft)

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

regolo.ai iconregolo.ai

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; organisations requiring broad certification coverage (ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018); regulated industries (Garante, CNIL); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment.

Detailed Comparison

AutoGen (Microsoft) vs regolo.ai: Trust & Compliance Comparison

AutoGen (Microsoft) (Microsoft Research, US) scores 18/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems. regolo.ai (Seeweb, IT) scores 23/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. EU-sovereign, zero-retention LLM inference on green Italian datacentres.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.
regolo.ai (5/5): All inference runs exclusively in Seeweb's Italian (EU) datacentres on renewable energy, with no data leaving the EU. Explicit EU-only residency.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

regolo.ai leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

AutoGen (Microsoft) (3/5): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.
regolo.ai (5/5): Operated by Seeweb S.r.l., an Italian company within the EU-listed DHH group, with no US parent. Fully under EU/Italian jurisdiction.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.
regolo.ai (5/5): Explicit zero-data-retention architecture: prompts and outputs processed in memory and discarded, never stored, logged long-term, or used for training, with GDPR/DPA alignment.

#### Certifications

regolo.ai leads with 4/5 vs 1/5.

AutoGen (Microsoft) (1/5): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.
regolo.ai (4/5): Inherits Seeweb's strong stack: ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 22301, 14001, 9001, plus CSA STAR Level 1, CISPE and ACN recognition. SOC 2 Type II is not published, so not a full 5.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

AutoGen (Microsoft) (4/5): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.
regolo.ai (4/5): Strong fit for most EU regulated industries via EU residency, zero retention, and broad ISO certification, suitable for buyers under the Italian Garante and other EU regulators; not yet sector-specific (e.g., no published BaFin/finance-specific attestations).

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationAutoGen (Microsoft)regolo.ai
ACN recognitionNoYes
CISPENoYes
CSA STAR Level 1NoYes
ISO 14001NoYes
ISO 9001NoYes
ISO/IEC 22301NoYes
ISO/IEC 27001NoYes
ISO/IEC 27017NoYes
ISO/IEC 27018NoYes

Overall Verdict

regolo.ai has a clear trust advantage, scoring 23/25 compared to AutoGen (Microsoft)'s 18/25. regolo.ai particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, AutoGen (Microsoft) or regolo.ai?

AutoGen (Microsoft) has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while regolo.ai scores 23/25. regolo.ai currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do AutoGen (Microsoft) and regolo.ai compare on data residency?

AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 5/5 for data residency (MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.), while regolo.ai scores 5/5 (All inference runs exclusively in Seeweb's Italian (EU) datacentres on renewable energy, with no data leaving the EU. Explicit EU-only residency.).

Are AutoGen (Microsoft) and regolo.ai GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. AutoGen (Microsoft) has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and regolo.ai scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool