Logseq

Open source privacy-first knowledge graph and note-taking with local storage

Capacities

German AI-powered knowledge management and note-taking for connected thinking

Logseq

Strong

20/25

Capacities

Strong

17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionLogseqCapacities

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Logseq: Local-first by default — all data stored on user's device; optional sync service can be avoided entirely

Capacities: Core data hosted in Germany; AI features route through OpenAI with zero-retention API option

5/5

Local-first by default — all data stored on user's device; optional sync service can be avoided entirely

4/5

Core data hosted in Germany; AI features route through OpenAI with zero-retention API option

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Logseq: Local application; no data transmitted to vendor by default; user has full legal control over their data

Capacities: German GmbH, EU-incorporated, no US parent entity, German law applies

5/5

Local application; no data transmitted to vendor by default; user has full legal control over their data

5/5

German GmbH, EU-incorporated, no US parent entity, German law applies

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Logseq: No vendor data retention at all in local mode; user controls all data lifecycle; no training possible

Capacities: No training on user data; AI layer uses OpenAI zero-retention API; core data under customer control

5/5

No vendor data retention at all in local mode; user controls all data lifecycle; no training possible

4/5

No training on user data; AI layer uses OpenAI zero-retention API; core data under customer control

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Logseq: No vendor certifications — not applicable for a local-first open source tool

Capacities: GDPR-compliant with DPA available; no ISO 27001 or SOC 2 as a small bootstrapped team

1/5

No vendor certifications — not applicable for a local-first open source tool

1/5

GDPR-compliant with DPA available; no ISO 27001 or SOC 2 as a small bootstrapped team

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Logseq: Excellent for individual use in regulated settings; limited enterprise controls reduce team deployment suitability

Capacities: Good for EU professionals and SMEs; limited enterprise controls restrict regulated-sector suitability

4/5

Excellent for individual use in regulated settings; limited enterprise controls reduce team deployment suitability

3/5

Good for EU professionals and SMEs; limited enterprise controls restrict regulated-sector suitability

Total Score

20/25

17/25

Best For

Logseq

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Capacities

Best for regulated industries (ICO, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Capacities vs Logseq: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Capacities (Capacities, DE) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. German AI-powered knowledge management and note-taking for connected thinking. Logseq (Logseq, US) scores 20/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open source privacy-first knowledge graph and note-taking with local storage.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Logseq leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Capacities (4/5): Core data hosted in Germany; AI features route through OpenAI with zero-retention API option

●Logseq (5/5): Local-first by default — all data stored on user's device; optional sync service can be avoided entirely

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 5/5.

●Capacities (5/5): German GmbH, EU-incorporated, no US parent entity, German law applies

●Logseq (5/5): Local application; no data transmitted to vendor by default; user has full legal control over their data

#### Data Retention & Training

Logseq leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Capacities (4/5): No training on user data; AI layer uses OpenAI zero-retention API; core data under customer control

●Logseq (5/5): No vendor data retention at all in local mode; user controls all data lifecycle; no training possible

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 1/5.

●Capacities (1/5): GDPR-compliant with DPA available; no ISO 27001 or SOC 2 as a small bootstrapped team

●Logseq (1/5): No vendor certifications — not applicable for a local-first open source tool

#### Regulatory Fit

Logseq leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

●Capacities (3/5): Good for EU professionals and SMEs; limited enterprise controls restrict regulated-sector suitability

●Logseq (4/5): Excellent for individual use in regulated settings; limited enterprise controls reduce team deployment suitability

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	Capacities	Logseq
GDPR	Yes	No

Overall Verdict

Logseq has a clear trust advantage, scoring 20/25 compared to Capacities's 17/25. Logseq particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Logseq or Capacities?

Logseq has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while Capacities scores 17/25. Logseq currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Logseq and Capacities compare on data residency?

Logseq scores 5/5 for data residency (Local-first by default — all data stored on user's device; optional sync service can be avoided entirely), while Capacities scores 4/5 (Core data hosted in Germany; AI features route through OpenAI with zero-retention API option).

Are Logseq and Capacities GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Logseq has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Capacities scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool