CENTURY Tech icon

CENTURY Tech

UK AI-powered personalised learning platform for schools and corporate L&D

vs
Hawk icon

Hawk

AI-native anti-money laundering and fraud prevention for banks and payment firms

CENTURY Tech
80%Strong
20/25
Hawk
88%Excellent
22/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionCENTURY TechHawk
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
CENTURY Tech: All learner and organisational data hosted in UK data centres. No cross-border data transfers without explicit consent. Appropriate for educational institutions with strict data localisation requirements for pupil data.
Hawk: European company offering SaaS or private-cloud deployment and GDPR compliance, but no publicly published EU-only data-residency commitment or named region. EU customers should confirm EU hosting via the DPA. Scored conservatively pending explicit residency disclosure.
5/5
3/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
CENTURY Tech: Incorporated in England and Wales under UK law. Regulated by ICO under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. Specialist educational data compliance framework. No CLOUD Act exposure. UK sovereignty story for educational data.
Hawk: Incorporated as Hawk AI GmbH in Munich, Germany (EU/EEA), with no US parent. Falls fully under EU/GDPR jurisdiction — ideal for EU regulated institutions.
4/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
CENTURY Tech: Learner data used only to personalise individual learning journeys within the subscribing organisation. Not shared across organisations for shared model training. Configurable data retention aligned with ICO guidance for educational data processors.
Hawk: Offers DPAs, encryption, GDPR-aligned PII handling and private-cloud isolation; AI learns from analyst feedback within the customer tenant. No public explicit shared-model no-training clause, so scored 4 pending DPA confirmation of retention and training terms.
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
CENTURY Tech: Holds ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials Plus. Cyber Essentials Plus is the UK government standard required for public sector contracts including DfE-funded schools and NHS training programmes. Appropriate certification portfolio for the education sector.
Hawk: Holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2, with ISO 22301 alignment and GDPR audits — a strong stack including sector-relevant resilience certification for a financial-crime vendor.
3/5
5/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
CENTURY Tech: Excellent fit for UK schools, colleges, and public sector training programmes requiring UK data hosting and ICO compliance. Good fit for corporate L&D in regulated industries where employee training completion and competency data must be auditable.
Hawk: Purpose-built for regulated EU financial institutions (AML/CFT, fraud), used by Tier-1 banks and payment firms; directly relevant to BaFin and other EU financial supervisors. Forrester Strong Performer, Q2 2025.
4/5
5/5
Total Score
20/25
22/25

Best For

CENTURY Tech iconCENTURY Tech

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (ICO, Ofsted); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Hawk iconHawk

Best for teams prioritising European legal jurisdiction; organisations requiring broad certification coverage (ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 22301 (alignment)); regulated industries (BaFin, BfDI); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment.

Detailed Comparison

CENTURY Tech vs Hawk: Trust & Compliance Comparison

CENTURY Tech (CENTURY Tech, GB) scores 20/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. UK AI-powered personalised learning platform for schools and corporate L&D. Hawk (Hawk, DE) scores 22/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. AI-native anti-money laundering and fraud prevention for banks and payment firms.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

CENTURY Tech leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

CENTURY Tech (5/5): All learner and organisational data hosted in UK data centres. No cross-border data transfers without explicit consent. Appropriate for educational institutions with strict data localisation requirements for pupil data.
Hawk (3/5): European company offering SaaS or private-cloud deployment and GDPR compliance, but no publicly published EU-only data-residency commitment or named region. EU customers should confirm EU hosting via the DPA. Scored conservatively pending explicit residency disclosure.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Hawk leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

CENTURY Tech (4/5): Incorporated in England and Wales under UK law. Regulated by ICO under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. Specialist educational data compliance framework. No CLOUD Act exposure. UK sovereignty story for educational data.
Hawk (5/5): Incorporated as Hawk AI GmbH in Munich, Germany (EU/EEA), with no US parent. Falls fully under EU/GDPR jurisdiction — ideal for EU regulated institutions.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

CENTURY Tech (4/5): Learner data used only to personalise individual learning journeys within the subscribing organisation. Not shared across organisations for shared model training. Configurable data retention aligned with ICO guidance for educational data processors.
Hawk (4/5): Offers DPAs, encryption, GDPR-aligned PII handling and private-cloud isolation; AI learns from analyst feedback within the customer tenant. No public explicit shared-model no-training clause, so scored 4 pending DPA confirmation of retention and training terms.

#### Certifications

Hawk leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

CENTURY Tech (3/5): Holds ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials Plus. Cyber Essentials Plus is the UK government standard required for public sector contracts including DfE-funded schools and NHS training programmes. Appropriate certification portfolio for the education sector.
Hawk (5/5): Holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2, with ISO 22301 alignment and GDPR audits — a strong stack including sector-relevant resilience certification for a financial-crime vendor.

#### Regulatory Fit

Hawk leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

CENTURY Tech (4/5): Excellent fit for UK schools, colleges, and public sector training programmes requiring UK data hosting and ICO compliance. Good fit for corporate L&D in regulated industries where employee training completion and competency data must be auditable.
Hawk (5/5): Purpose-built for regulated EU financial institutions (AML/CFT, fraud), used by Tier-1 banks and payment firms; directly relevant to BaFin and other EU financial supervisors. Forrester Strong Performer, Q2 2025.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationCENTURY TechHawk
Cyber Essentials PlusYesNo
GDPRNoYes
ISO 22301 (alignment)NoYes
ISO 27001YesNo
ISO/IEC 27001:2022NoYes
SOC 2 Type 2NoYes

Overall Verdict

Hawk has a clear trust advantage, scoring 22/25 compared to CENTURY Tech's 20/25. Hawk particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, CENTURY Tech or Hawk?

CENTURY Tech has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while Hawk scores 22/25. Hawk currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do CENTURY Tech and Hawk compare on data residency?

CENTURY Tech scores 5/5 for data residency (All learner and organisational data hosted in UK data centres. No cross-border data transfers without explicit consent. Appropriate for educational institutions with strict data localisation requirements for pupil data.), while Hawk scores 3/5 (European company offering SaaS or private-cloud deployment and GDPR compliance, but no publicly published EU-only data-residency commitment or named region. EU customers should confirm EU hosting via the DPA. Scored conservatively pending explicit residency disclosure.).

Are CENTURY Tech and Hawk GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. CENTURY Tech has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Hawk scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool