Phind icon

Phind

AI search engine and coding assistant built for developers

vs
Windsurf (Codeium) icon

Windsurf (Codeium)

Agentic AI IDE and code assistant that understands your entire codebase

Phind
44%Caution
11/25
Windsurf (Codeium)
52%Moderate
13/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionPhindWindsurf (Codeium)
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Phind: Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.
Windsurf (Codeium): Hosted product uses US cloud infrastructure. Enterprise self-hosted deployment allows EU data residency. Score reflects hosted product; self-hosted enterprise achieves a score of 5.
2/5
2/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Phind: US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act. No EU legal entity.
Windsurf (Codeium): US incorporation, California jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. Enterprise DPA available. Self-hosted enterprise deployments remove US data processing dependency.
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Phind: Users can opt out of data being used for model training. Search history can be deleted. Reasonable privacy controls for a developer tool.
Windsurf (Codeium): Enterprise and paid tiers: code and prompts not used for shared model training. Telemetry controls available. Self-hosted deployments provide maximum control.
3/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Phind: No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup without formal compliance programme.
Windsurf (Codeium): Holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Appropriate for an enterprise code assistant. ISO 27001 would further strengthen the posture for European enterprise procurement.
2/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Phind: Suitable for general developer use but lacks enterprise compliance features for regulated industries. No DPA or audit capabilities offered.
Windsurf (Codeium): Hosted product requires GDPR SCCs for EU deployment in regulated industries. Enterprise self-hosted option is well-suited for organisations with strict IP and data sovereignty requirements. EU-regulated industries should use self-hosted deployment path.
2/5
2/5
Total Score
11/25
13/25

Best For

Phind iconPhind

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Windsurf (Codeium) iconWindsurf (Codeium)

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Windsurf (Codeium) vs Phind: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Windsurf (Codeium) (Codeium, US) scores 13/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Agentic AI IDE and code assistant that understands your entire codebase. Phind (Phind, US) scores 11/25 with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI search engine and coding assistant built for developers.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 2/5.

Windsurf (Codeium) (2/5): Hosted product uses US cloud infrastructure. Enterprise self-hosted deployment allows EU data residency. Score reflects hosted product; self-hosted enterprise achieves a score of 5.
Phind (2/5): Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

Windsurf (Codeium) (2/5): US incorporation, California jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. Enterprise DPA available. Self-hosted enterprise deployments remove US data processing dependency.
Phind (2/5): US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act. No EU legal entity.

#### Data Retention & Training

Windsurf (Codeium) leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Windsurf (Codeium) (4/5): Enterprise and paid tiers: code and prompts not used for shared model training. Telemetry controls available. Self-hosted deployments provide maximum control.
Phind (3/5): Users can opt out of data being used for model training. Search history can be deleted. Reasonable privacy controls for a developer tool.

#### Certifications

Windsurf (Codeium) leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Windsurf (Codeium) (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II certification. Appropriate for an enterprise code assistant. ISO 27001 would further strengthen the posture for European enterprise procurement.
Phind (2/5): No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup without formal compliance programme.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 2/5.

Windsurf (Codeium) (2/5): Hosted product requires GDPR SCCs for EU deployment in regulated industries. Enterprise self-hosted option is well-suited for organisations with strict IP and data sovereignty requirements. EU-regulated industries should use self-hosted deployment path.
Phind (2/5): Suitable for general developer use but lacks enterprise compliance features for regulated industries. No DPA or audit capabilities offered.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationWindsurf (Codeium)Phind
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

Windsurf (Codeium) has a clear trust advantage, scoring 13/25 compared to Phind's 11/25. Windsurf (Codeium) particularly excels in data retention & training, certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Phind or Windsurf (Codeium)?

Phind has a TrustKit score of 11/25 while Windsurf (Codeium) scores 13/25. Windsurf (Codeium) currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Phind and Windsurf (Codeium) compare on data residency?

Phind scores 2/5 for data residency (Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.), while Windsurf (Codeium) scores 2/5 (Hosted product uses US cloud infrastructure. Enterprise self-hosted deployment allows EU data residency. Score reflects hosted product; self-hosted enterprise achieves a score of 5.).

Are Phind and Windsurf (Codeium) GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Phind has a regulatory fit score of 2/5 and Windsurf (Codeium) scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool