CodeRabbit

AI-powered code review platform that automatically reviews pull requests for bugs, security, and quality

Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls

CodeRabbit

Moderate

13/25

Sourcegraph Cody

Strong

18/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionCodeRabbitSourcegraph Cody

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

CodeRabbit: US cloud infrastructure. Source code is processed in US data centres for review. No EU-specific hosting option publicly documented.

Sourcegraph Cody: Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

2/5

US cloud infrastructure. Source code is processed in US data centres for review. No EU-specific hosting option publicly documented.

3/5

Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

CodeRabbit: California incorporation. US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act apply. Source code access makes jurisdiction particularly relevant.

Sourcegraph Cody: US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

2/5

California incorporation. US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act apply. Source code access makes jurisdiction particularly relevant.

3/5

US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

CodeRabbit: Code not used for model training per policy. Review data isolated per organisation. Clear data handling terms for enterprise customers.

Sourcegraph Cody: Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

4/5

Code not used for model training per policy. Review data isolated per organisation. Clear data handling terms for enterprise customers.

5/5

Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

CodeRabbit: SOC 2 Type II certified. ISO 27001 not confirmed. Solid for a Series B developer tooling company.

Sourcegraph Cody: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

3/5

SOC 2 Type II certified. ISO 27001 not confirmed. Solid for a Series B developer tooling company.

4/5

Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

CodeRabbit: US jurisdiction with source code access is a significant consideration for EU regulated industries. Suitable for European tech companies with lower compliance requirements. GDPR DPA available.

Sourcegraph Cody: Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

2/5

US jurisdiction with source code access is a significant consideration for EU regulated industries. Suitable for European tech companies with lower compliance requirements. GDPR DPA available.

3/5

Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Total Score

13/25

18/25

Best For

CodeRabbit

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Sourcegraph Cody

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

CodeRabbit vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison

CodeRabbit (CodeRabbit, US) scores 13/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered code review platform that automatically reviews pull requests for bugs, security, and quality. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●CodeRabbit (2/5): US cloud infrastructure. Source code is processed in US data centres for review. No EU-specific hosting option publicly documented.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●CodeRabbit (2/5): California incorporation. US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act apply. Source code access makes jurisdiction particularly relevant.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

#### Data Retention & Training

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●CodeRabbit (4/5): Code not used for model training per policy. Review data isolated per organisation. Clear data handling terms for enterprise customers.

●Sourcegraph Cody (5/5): Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

#### Certifications

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

●CodeRabbit (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified. ISO 27001 not confirmed. Solid for a Series B developer tooling company.

●Sourcegraph Cody (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●CodeRabbit (2/5): US jurisdiction with source code access is a significant consideration for EU regulated industries. Suitable for European tech companies with lower compliance requirements. GDPR DPA available.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	CodeRabbit	Sourcegraph Cody
ISO 27001	No	Yes
SOC 2 Type II	Yes	Yes

Overall Verdict

Sourcegraph Cody has a clear trust advantage, scoring 18/25 compared to CodeRabbit's 13/25. Sourcegraph Cody particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, CodeRabbit or Sourcegraph Cody?

CodeRabbit has a TrustKit score of 13/25 while Sourcegraph Cody scores 18/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do CodeRabbit and Sourcegraph Cody compare on data residency?

CodeRabbit scores 2/5 for data residency (US cloud infrastructure. Source code is processed in US data centres for review. No EU-specific hosting option publicly documented.), while Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.).

Are CodeRabbit and Sourcegraph Cody GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. CodeRabbit has a regulatory fit score of 2/5 and Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool