Kagi

Privacy-first AI search engine with no ads and no tracking

Consensus

AI-powered search engine for evidence-based scientific research

Kagi

Caution

11/25

Consensus

Caution

9/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionKagiConsensus

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Kagi: All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently available.

Consensus: All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently offered.

1/5

All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently available.

1/5

All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently offered.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Kagi: US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; strong privacy-by-design model but US legal jurisdiction is a residual risk.

Consensus: US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; no publicised EU-specific legal frameworks or SCCs are in place.

2/5

US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; strong privacy-by-design model but US legal jurisdiction is a residual risk.

2/5

US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; no publicised EU-specific legal frameworks or SCCs are in place.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Kagi: No training on user search data, no persistent user profiling, and no ad-based tracking by design.

Consensus: States it does not sell user data and does not train on user queries; full retention policy details are limited.

5/5

No training on user search data, no persistent user profiling, and no ad-based tracking by design.

3/5

States it does not sell user data and does not train on user queries; full retention policy details are limited.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Kagi: No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.

Consensus: No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.

1/5

No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.

1/5

No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Kagi: Privacy-first business model is commendable, but lack of certifications and US jurisdiction limit regulated institutional use in Europe.

Consensus: Acceptable for low-risk research activities; European institutional procurement will require additional assurances not currently available.

2/5

Privacy-first business model is commendable, but lack of certifications and US jurisdiction limit regulated institutional use in Europe.

2/5

Acceptable for low-risk research activities; European institutional procurement will require additional assurances not currently available.

Total Score

11/25

9/25

Best For

Kagi

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Consensus

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Detailed Comparison

Consensus vs Kagi: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Consensus (Consensus, US) scores 9/25 overall with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI-powered search engine for evidence-based scientific research. Kagi (Kagi, US) scores 11/25 with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. Privacy-first AI search engine with no ads and no tracking.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 1/5.

●Consensus (1/5): All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently offered.

●Kagi (1/5): All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently available.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

●Consensus (2/5): US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; no publicised EU-specific legal frameworks or SCCs are in place.

●Kagi (2/5): US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; strong privacy-by-design model but US legal jurisdiction is a residual risk.

#### Data Retention & Training

Kagi leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●Consensus (3/5): States it does not sell user data and does not train on user queries; full retention policy details are limited.

●Kagi (5/5): No training on user search data, no persistent user profiling, and no ad-based tracking by design.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 1/5.

●Consensus (1/5): No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.

●Kagi (1/5): No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 2/5.

●Consensus (2/5): Acceptable for low-risk research activities; European institutional procurement will require additional assurances not currently available.

●Kagi (2/5): Privacy-first business model is commendable, but lack of certifications and US jurisdiction limit regulated institutional use in Europe.

Overall Verdict

Kagi has a clear trust advantage, scoring 11/25 compared to Consensus's 9/25. Kagi particularly excels in data retention & training.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Kagi or Consensus?

Kagi has a TrustKit score of 11/25 while Consensus scores 9/25. Kagi currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Kagi and Consensus compare on data residency?

Kagi scores 1/5 for data residency (All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently available.), while Consensus scores 1/5 (All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently offered.).

Are Kagi and Consensus GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Kagi has a regulatory fit score of 2/5 and Consensus scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool