Pieces for Developers

AI-powered developer productivity tool with on-device copilot and snippet management

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM

Moderate

14/25

Continue

Strong

17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionPieces for DevelopersContinue

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Pieces for Developers: Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.

Continue: Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

3/5

Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.

5/5

Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Pieces for Developers: US entity. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, local-first architecture minimises jurisdictional data concerns.

Continue: Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

2/5

US entity. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, local-first architecture minimises jurisdictional data concerns.

2/5

Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Pieces for Developers: Local-first by default — all data stored on the user's device. No cloud required for core functionality. Full user control over data retention.

Continue: Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

4/5

Local-first by default — all data stored on the user's device. No cloud required for core functionality. Full user control over data retention.

5/5

Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Pieces for Developers: No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Local-first architecture reduces reliance on cloud certifications.

Continue: No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

2/5

No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Local-first architecture reduces reliance on cloud certifications.

1/5

No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Pieces for Developers: On-device processing makes it suitable for environments with strict data governance. No data leaves the device in local mode, addressing many regulatory concerns.

Continue: Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

3/5

On-device processing makes it suitable for environments with strict data governance. No data leaves the device in local mode, addressing many regulatory concerns.

4/5

Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

Total Score

14/25

17/25

Best For

Pieces for Developers

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Continue

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Continue vs Pieces for Developers: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Continue (Continue, US) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM. Pieces for Developers (Pieces for Developers, US) scores 14/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered developer productivity tool with on-device copilot and snippet management.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Continue leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●Continue (5/5): Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

●Pieces for Developers (3/5): Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

●Continue (2/5): Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

●Pieces for Developers (2/5): US entity. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, local-first architecture minimises jurisdictional data concerns.

#### Data Retention & Training

Continue leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Continue (5/5): Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

●Pieces for Developers (4/5): Local-first by default — all data stored on the user's device. No cloud required for core functionality. Full user control over data retention.

#### Certifications

Pieces for Developers leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

●Continue (1/5): No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

●Pieces for Developers (2/5): No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Local-first architecture reduces reliance on cloud certifications.

#### Regulatory Fit

Continue leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

●Continue (4/5): Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

●Pieces for Developers (3/5): On-device processing makes it suitable for environments with strict data governance. No data leaves the device in local mode, addressing many regulatory concerns.

Overall Verdict

Continue has a clear trust advantage, scoring 17/25 compared to Pieces for Developers's 14/25. Continue particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Pieces for Developers or Continue?

Pieces for Developers has a TrustKit score of 14/25 while Continue scores 17/25. Continue currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Pieces for Developers and Continue compare on data residency?

Pieces for Developers scores 3/5 for data residency (Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.), while Continue scores 5/5 (Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.).

Are Pieces for Developers and Continue GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Pieces for Developers has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Continue scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool

Pieces for Developers