Qodo

AI code review and testing tool with agentic workflows for quality assurance

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM

Qodo

Strong

17/25

Continue

Strong

17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionQodoContinue

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Qodo: Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.

Continue: Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

4/5

Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.

5/5

Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Qodo: Israeli company with adequate GDPR data transfer status. On-premise deployment mitigates jurisdiction concerns. Not subject to US CLOUD Act as primary entity.

Continue: Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

3/5

Israeli company with adequate GDPR data transfer status. On-premise deployment mitigates jurisdiction concerns. Not subject to US CLOUD Act as primary entity.

2/5

Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Qodo: Code not used for training. Self-hosted option means code never leaves customer infrastructure. Clear data handling policies.

Continue: Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

4/5

Code not used for training. Self-hosted option means code never leaves customer infrastructure. Clear data handling policies.

5/5

Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Qodo: SOC 2 Type II certified. GDPR compliant. Strong security posture for a development tool. No ISO 27001.

Continue: No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

3/5

SOC 2 Type II certified. GDPR compliant. Strong security posture for a development tool. No ISO 27001.

1/5

No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Qodo: Self-hosted deployment suitable for regulated industries. SOC 2 certified. Good fit for financial services and enterprises with strict code security requirements.

Continue: Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

3/5

Self-hosted deployment suitable for regulated industries. SOC 2 certified. Good fit for financial services and enterprises with strict code security requirements.

4/5

Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

Total Score

17/25

Best For

Qodo

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Continue

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Continue vs Qodo: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Continue (Continue, US) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM. Qodo (Qodo, IL) scores 17/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI code review and testing tool with agentic workflows for quality assurance.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Continue leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Continue (5/5): Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

●Qodo (4/5): Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Qodo leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Continue (2/5): Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

●Qodo (3/5): Israeli company with adequate GDPR data transfer status. On-premise deployment mitigates jurisdiction concerns. Not subject to US CLOUD Act as primary entity.

#### Data Retention & Training

Continue leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Continue (5/5): Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

●Qodo (4/5): Code not used for training. Self-hosted option means code never leaves customer infrastructure. Clear data handling policies.

#### Certifications

Qodo leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

●Continue (1/5): No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

●Qodo (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified. GDPR compliant. Strong security posture for a development tool. No ISO 27001.

#### Regulatory Fit

Continue leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

●Continue (4/5): Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

●Qodo (3/5): Self-hosted deployment suitable for regulated industries. SOC 2 certified. Good fit for financial services and enterprises with strict code security requirements.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	Continue	Qodo
GDPR DPA	No	Yes
SOC 2 Type II	No	Yes

Overall Verdict

Continue and Qodo are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 17/25 and 17/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Qodo or Continue?

Qodo has a TrustKit score of 17/25 while Continue scores 17/25. Both tools are currently rated equally across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Qodo and Continue compare on data residency?

Qodo scores 4/5 for data residency (Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.), while Continue scores 5/5 (Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.).

Are Qodo and Continue GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Qodo has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Continue scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool