Sourcegraph Cody icon

Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls

vs
Continue icon

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM

Sourcegraph Cody
72%Strong
18/25
Continue
68%Strong
17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionSourcegraph CodyContinue
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Sourcegraph Cody: Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.
Continue: Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.
3/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Sourcegraph Cody: US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.
Continue: Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.
3/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Sourcegraph Cody: Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.
Continue: Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Sourcegraph Cody: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.
Continue: No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.
4/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Sourcegraph Cody: Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.
Continue: Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.
3/5
4/5
Total Score
18/25
17/25

Best For

Sourcegraph Cody iconSourcegraph Cody

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Continue iconContinue

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Continue (Continue, US) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Continue leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Continue (5/5): Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Continue (2/5): Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Continue (5/5): Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.
Sourcegraph Cody (5/5): Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

#### Certifications

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 1/5.

Continue (1/5): No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.
Sourcegraph Cody (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Continue leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Continue (4/5): Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationContinueSourcegraph Cody
ISO 27001NoYes
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Continue and Sourcegraph Cody are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 17/25 and 18/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Continue?

Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Continue scores 17/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Sourcegraph Cody and Continue compare on data residency?

Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Continue scores 5/5 (Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.).

Are Sourcegraph Cody and Continue GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Continue scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool