Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls
Continue
Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM
Score Breakdown
Best For
Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.
Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.
Detailed Comparison
Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison
Continue (Continue, US) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.
Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown
#### Data Residency
Continue leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.
#### Legal Jurisdiction
Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.
#### Data Retention & Training
Both score equally at 5/5.
#### Certifications
Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 1/5.
#### Regulatory Fit
Continue leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.
Certifications at a Glance
| Certification | Continue | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | No | Yes |
| SOC 2 Type II | No | Yes |
Overall Verdict
Continue and Sourcegraph Cody are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 17/25 and 18/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Continue?
Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Continue scores 17/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.
How do Sourcegraph Cody and Continue compare on data residency?
Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Continue scores 5/5 (Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.).
Are Sourcegraph Cody and Continue GDPR compliant?
Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Continue scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.