CrewAI

Open-source framework for orchestrating multi-agent AI systems and autonomous teams

Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

CrewAI

Moderate

15/25

Rasa

Strong

19/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionCrewAIRasa

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

CrewAI: Self-hosted framework: maximum data sovereignty—deploy on any EU infrastructure. Cloud platform: US-hosted. Score reflects the self-hosted path which most serious EU deployments will use.

Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

4/5

Self-hosted framework: maximum data sovereignty—deploy on any EU infrastructure. Cloud platform: US-hosted. Score reflects the self-hosted path which most serious EU deployments will use.

5/5

Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

CrewAI: US-incorporated but Apache 2.0 open-source licence means self-hosted instances are not under vendor jurisdiction. Cloud platform falls under US jurisdiction. Self-hosted EU deployments achieve full EU legal control.

Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

3/5

US-incorporated but Apache 2.0 open-source licence means self-hosted instances are not under vendor jurisdiction. Cloud platform falls under US jurisdiction. Self-hosted EU deployments achieve full EU legal control.

3/5

Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

CrewAI: Self-hosted: full control over all agent data, task outputs, and intermediate results. Cloud platform has standard SaaS data retention. Open-source path provides maximum data lifecycle control.

Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

4/5

Self-hosted: full control over all agent data, task outputs, and intermediate results. Cloud platform has standard SaaS data retention. Open-source path provides maximum data lifecycle control.

5/5

Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

CrewAI: No published independent security certifications for the company. Early-stage startup with self-attested security practices. For self-hosted enterprise deployments, your own security controls apply.

Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

1/5

No published independent security certifications for the company. Early-stage startup with self-attested security practices. For self-hosted enterprise deployments, your own security controls apply.

2/5

Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

CrewAI: Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit. Cloud platform not recommended for EU regulated industries. Good choice for technical teams building multi-agent AI systems with sovereignty requirements.

Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

3/5

Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit. Cloud platform not recommended for EU regulated industries. Good choice for technical teams building multi-agent AI systems with sovereignty requirements.

4/5

Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Total Score

15/25

19/25

Best For

CrewAI

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Rasa

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

CrewAI vs Rasa: Trust & Compliance Comparison

CrewAI (CrewAI, US) scores 15/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Open-source framework for orchestrating multi-agent AI systems and autonomous teams. Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●CrewAI (4/5): Self-hosted framework: maximum data sovereignty—deploy on any EU infrastructure. Cloud platform: US-hosted. Score reflects the self-hosted path which most serious EU deployments will use.

●Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 3/5.

●CrewAI (3/5): US-incorporated but Apache 2.0 open-source licence means self-hosted instances are not under vendor jurisdiction. Cloud platform falls under US jurisdiction. Self-hosted EU deployments achieve full EU legal control.

●Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

#### Data Retention & Training

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●CrewAI (4/5): Self-hosted: full control over all agent data, task outputs, and intermediate results. Cloud platform has standard SaaS data retention. Open-source path provides maximum data lifecycle control.

●Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

#### Certifications

Rasa leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

●CrewAI (1/5): No published independent security certifications for the company. Early-stage startup with self-attested security practices. For self-hosted enterprise deployments, your own security controls apply.

●Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

#### Regulatory Fit

Rasa leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

●CrewAI (3/5): Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit. Cloud platform not recommended for EU regulated industries. Good choice for technical teams building multi-agent AI systems with sovereignty requirements.

●Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Overall Verdict

Rasa has a clear trust advantage, scoring 19/25 compared to CrewAI's 15/25. Rasa particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, CrewAI or Rasa?

CrewAI has a TrustKit score of 15/25 while Rasa scores 19/25. Rasa currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do CrewAI and Rasa compare on data residency?

CrewAI scores 4/5 for data residency (Self-hosted framework: maximum data sovereignty—deploy on any EU infrastructure. Cloud platform: US-hosted. Score reflects the self-hosted path which most serious EU deployments will use.), while Rasa scores 5/5 (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.).

Are CrewAI and Rasa GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. CrewAI has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Rasa scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool