Rasa icon

Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

vs
Flowise icon

Flowise

Open-source low-code tool for building LLM applications and AI agents visually

Rasa
76%Strong
19/25
Flowise
68%Strong
17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionRasaFlowise
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
Flowise: Self-hosted deployment provides maximum data sovereignty—data stays entirely within your own infrastructure. Score reflects self-hosted path. Cloud product is US-hosted (score 1).
5/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
Flowise: US-incorporated company but open-source Apache 2.0 licence means self-hosted instances are independent of vendor jurisdiction. For self-hosted EU deployments, your infrastructure jurisdiction governs. Cloud product falls under US jurisdiction.
3/5
3/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
Flowise: Self-hosted: full control over all data lifecycle. No data leaves your infrastructure. Conversation history, documents, and embeddings are entirely under your management.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
Flowise: Early-stage company with no published independent security certifications. Open-source self-hosted path means your own security controls apply. Cloud product has no published certifications.
2/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
Flowise: Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit for EU organisations. Cloud product not recommended for regulated EU industries. Good choice for technical teams building sovereignty-first AI applications.
4/5
3/5
Total Score
19/25
17/25

Best For

Rasa iconRasa

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Flowise iconFlowise

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Flowise vs Rasa: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Flowise (FlowiseAI, US) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source low-code tool for building LLM applications and AI agents visually. Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

Flowise (5/5): Self-hosted deployment provides maximum data sovereignty—data stays entirely within your own infrastructure. Score reflects self-hosted path. Cloud product is US-hosted (score 1).
Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 3/5.

Flowise (3/5): US-incorporated company but open-source Apache 2.0 licence means self-hosted instances are independent of vendor jurisdiction. For self-hosted EU deployments, your infrastructure jurisdiction governs. Cloud product falls under US jurisdiction.
Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Flowise (5/5): Self-hosted: full control over all data lifecycle. No data leaves your infrastructure. Conversation history, documents, and embeddings are entirely under your management.
Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

#### Certifications

Rasa leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

Flowise (1/5): Early-stage company with no published independent security certifications. Open-source self-hosted path means your own security controls apply. Cloud product has no published certifications.
Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

#### Regulatory Fit

Rasa leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Flowise (3/5): Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit for EU organisations. Cloud product not recommended for regulated EU industries. Good choice for technical teams building sovereignty-first AI applications.
Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Overall Verdict

Rasa has a clear trust advantage, scoring 19/25 compared to Flowise's 17/25. Rasa particularly excels in certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Rasa or Flowise?

Rasa has a TrustKit score of 19/25 while Flowise scores 17/25. Rasa currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Rasa and Flowise compare on data residency?

Rasa scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.), while Flowise scores 5/5 (Self-hosted deployment provides maximum data sovereignty—data stays entirely within your own infrastructure. Score reflects self-hosted path. Cloud product is US-hosted (score 1).).

Are Rasa and Flowise GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Rasa has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Flowise scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool