Langdock icon

Langdock

GDPR-compliant enterprise AI platform for chat, assistants, and workflow automation

vs
Giskard icon

Giskard

Open-source and enterprise AI red-teaming platform for LLM security and quality testing

Langdock
96%Excellent
24/25
Giskard
92%Excellent
23/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionLangdockGiskard
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Langdock: All data hosted in the EU by default; self-hosting option available for maximum control
Giskard: EU-incorporated vendor offering EU data residency with SaaS, private-cloud, and full on-premise deployment, plus an explicitly EU-sovereign guardrail product (Guards). Data isolation is a core selling point for regulated customers.
5/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Langdock: German GmbH under EU law; fully GDPR-native architecture with no CLOUD Act exposure
Giskard: Incorporated in France as Giskard SAS with no US parent. Subject to French and EU law and GDPR directly; not exposed to the US CLOUD Act for EU-hosted deployments.
5/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Langdock: Customer data never used for AI training; full data deletion on request
Giskard: States a zero-training policy on customer data with IP protection, and offers data isolation plus enterprise retention controls via private-cloud/on-premise deployment. DPA available as an EU SOC 2 / HIPAA vendor.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Langdock: ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II audited
Giskard: SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance are publicly stated. ISO 27001 was not found in public sources, which would strengthen the posture; certifications scored on the confirmed SOC 2 Type II.
4/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Langdock: Ideal for EU-regulated organisations; EU hosting, German jurisdiction, GDPR-native, and strong certifications
Giskard: Purpose-built for AI assurance in regulated EU industries, with named financial-sector customers (AXA, BNP Paribas) and EU-sovereign deployment aligned to the EU AI Act's testing and risk-management expectations.
5/5
5/5
Total Score
24/25
23/25

Best For

Langdock iconLangdock

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (CNIL, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Giskard iconGiskard

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (ICO, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment.

Detailed Comparison

Giskard vs Langdock: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Giskard (Giskard, FR) scores 23/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Open-source and enterprise AI red-teaming platform for LLM security and quality testing. Langdock (Langdock GmbH, DE) scores 24/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. GDPR-compliant enterprise AI platform for chat, assistants, and workflow automation.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

Giskard (5/5): EU-incorporated vendor offering EU data residency with SaaS, private-cloud, and full on-premise deployment, plus an explicitly EU-sovereign guardrail product (Guards). Data isolation is a core selling point for regulated customers.
Langdock (5/5): All data hosted in the EU by default; self-hosting option available for maximum control

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 5/5.

Giskard (5/5): Incorporated in France as Giskard SAS with no US parent. Subject to French and EU law and GDPR directly; not exposed to the US CLOUD Act for EU-hosted deployments.
Langdock (5/5): German GmbH under EU law; fully GDPR-native architecture with no CLOUD Act exposure

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Giskard (5/5): States a zero-training policy on customer data with IP protection, and offers data isolation plus enterprise retention controls via private-cloud/on-premise deployment. DPA available as an EU SOC 2 / HIPAA vendor.
Langdock (5/5): Customer data never used for AI training; full data deletion on request

#### Certifications

Langdock leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Giskard (3/5): SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance are publicly stated. ISO 27001 was not found in public sources, which would strengthen the posture; certifications scored on the confirmed SOC 2 Type II.
Langdock (4/5): ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II audited

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 5/5.

Giskard (5/5): Purpose-built for AI assurance in regulated EU industries, with named financial-sector customers (AXA, BNP Paribas) and EU-sovereign deployment aligned to the EU AI Act's testing and risk-management expectations.
Langdock (5/5): Ideal for EU-regulated organisations; EU hosting, German jurisdiction, GDPR-native, and strong certifications

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGiskardLangdock
HIPAAYesNo
ISO 27001NoYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Giskard and Langdock are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 23/25 and 24/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Langdock or Giskard?

Langdock has a TrustKit score of 24/25 while Giskard scores 23/25. Langdock currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Langdock and Giskard compare on data residency?

Langdock scores 5/5 for data residency (All data hosted in the EU by default; self-hosting option available for maximum control), while Giskard scores 5/5 (EU-incorporated vendor offering EU data residency with SaaS, private-cloud, and full on-premise deployment, plus an explicitly EU-sovereign guardrail product (Guards). Data isolation is a core selling point for regulated customers.).

Are Langdock and Giskard GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Langdock has a regulatory fit score of 5/5 and Giskard scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool