Prediction Guard icon

Prediction Guard

Privacy-first LLM API with built-in compliance and safety controls

vs
Giskard icon

Giskard

Open-source and enterprise AI red-teaming platform for LLM security and quality testing

Prediction Guard
80%Strong
20/25
Giskard
92%Excellent
23/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionPrediction GuardGiskard
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Prediction Guard: Offers EU deployment options alongside US hosting. VPC and on-premise deployments available for full data sovereignty. Flexible hosting model.
Giskard: EU-incorporated vendor offering EU data residency with SaaS, private-cloud, and full on-premise deployment, plus an explicitly EU-sovereign guardrail product (Guards). Data isolation is a core selling point for regulated customers.
4/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Prediction Guard: US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, on-premise deployment mitigates many jurisdiction concerns for EU customers.
Giskard: Incorporated in France as Giskard SAS with no US parent. Subject to French and EU law and GDPR directly; not exposed to the US CLOUD Act for EU-hosted deployments.
3/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Prediction Guard: No customer data used for training. Built-in PII redaction. Configurable data retention. On-premise option means data never leaves customer infrastructure.
Giskard: States a zero-training policy on customer data with IP protection, and offers data isolation plus enterprise retention controls via private-cloud/on-premise deployment. DPA available as an EU SOC 2 / HIPAA vendor.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Prediction Guard: SOC 2 Type II certified. HIPAA BAA available. Strong compliance posture for a startup. No ISO 27001 yet.
Giskard: SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance are publicly stated. ISO 27001 was not found in public sources, which would strengthen the posture; certifications scored on the confirmed SOC 2 Type II.
4/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Prediction Guard: Purpose-built for regulated industries. HIPAA compliant for healthcare. Safety controls address key regulatory concerns around AI outputs in sensitive contexts.
Giskard: Purpose-built for AI assurance in regulated EU industries, with named financial-sector customers (AXA, BNP Paribas) and EU-sovereign deployment aligned to the EU AI Act's testing and risk-management expectations.
4/5
5/5
Total Score
20/25
23/25

Best For

Prediction Guard iconPrediction Guard

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (CNIL, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Giskard iconGiskard

Best for regulated industries (HHS, FDA); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment.

Detailed Comparison

Giskard vs Prediction Guard: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Giskard (Giskard, FR) scores 23/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Open-source and enterprise AI red-teaming platform for LLM security and quality testing. Prediction Guard (Prediction Guard, US) scores 20/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Privacy-first LLM API with built-in compliance and safety controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Giskard leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Giskard (5/5): EU-incorporated vendor offering EU data residency with SaaS, private-cloud, and full on-premise deployment, plus an explicitly EU-sovereign guardrail product (Guards). Data isolation is a core selling point for regulated customers.
Prediction Guard (4/5): Offers EU deployment options alongside US hosting. VPC and on-premise deployments available for full data sovereignty. Flexible hosting model.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Giskard leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Giskard (5/5): Incorporated in France as Giskard SAS with no US parent. Subject to French and EU law and GDPR directly; not exposed to the US CLOUD Act for EU-hosted deployments.
Prediction Guard (3/5): US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, on-premise deployment mitigates many jurisdiction concerns for EU customers.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Giskard (5/5): States a zero-training policy on customer data with IP protection, and offers data isolation plus enterprise retention controls via private-cloud/on-premise deployment. DPA available as an EU SOC 2 / HIPAA vendor.
Prediction Guard (5/5): No customer data used for training. Built-in PII redaction. Configurable data retention. On-premise option means data never leaves customer infrastructure.

#### Certifications

Prediction Guard leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Giskard (3/5): SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance are publicly stated. ISO 27001 was not found in public sources, which would strengthen the posture; certifications scored on the confirmed SOC 2 Type II.
Prediction Guard (4/5): SOC 2 Type II certified. HIPAA BAA available. Strong compliance posture for a startup. No ISO 27001 yet.

#### Regulatory Fit

Giskard leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Giskard (5/5): Purpose-built for AI assurance in regulated EU industries, with named financial-sector customers (AXA, BNP Paribas) and EU-sovereign deployment aligned to the EU AI Act's testing and risk-management expectations.
Prediction Guard (4/5): Purpose-built for regulated industries. HIPAA compliant for healthcare. Safety controls address key regulatory concerns around AI outputs in sensitive contexts.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGiskardPrediction Guard
HIPAAYesNo
HIPAA BAANoYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Giskard has a clear trust advantage, scoring 23/25 compared to Prediction Guard's 20/25. Giskard particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Prediction Guard or Giskard?

Prediction Guard has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while Giskard scores 23/25. Giskard currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Prediction Guard and Giskard compare on data residency?

Prediction Guard scores 4/5 for data residency (Offers EU deployment options alongside US hosting. VPC and on-premise deployments available for full data sovereignty. Flexible hosting model.), while Giskard scores 5/5 (EU-incorporated vendor offering EU data residency with SaaS, private-cloud, and full on-premise deployment, plus an explicitly EU-sovereign guardrail product (Guards). Data isolation is a core selling point for regulated customers.).

Are Prediction Guard and Giskard GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Prediction Guard has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Giskard scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool