GLBNXT icon

GLBNXT

Europe's first sovereign AI platform beyond the reach of US cloud law

vs
Lumo (Proton) icon

Lumo (Proton)

Privacy-first AI assistant from the makers of ProtonMail, with Swiss jurisdiction and zero-access encryption

GLBNXT
92%Excellent
23/25
Lumo (Proton)
92%Excellent
23/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGLBNXTLumo (Proton)
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
GLBNXT: EU-only infrastructure in the Netherlands; data physically cannot leave EU
Lumo (Proton): Data hosted in Proton's own data centres in Germany and Norway. Zero-access encryption means even Proton cannot read conversation content. No US infrastructure dependency.
5/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
GLBNXT: Dutch B.V. under EU law; not subject to US CLOUD Act or FISA
Lumo (Proton): Swiss incorporation provides one of the strongest privacy jurisdictions globally. Outside US CLOUD Act reach. Swiss FADP and GDPR adequacy. Proton has a decade-long track record of defending user privacy.
5/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
GLBNXT: No training on customer data; sovereign-by-design data governance
Lumo (Proton): Zero-access encryption on conversations. User data explicitly never used for model training. Open-source code enables independent verification of privacy claims.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
GLBNXT: ISO 27001 certified; additional certifications expected as company matures
Lumo (Proton): ISO 27001 and SOC 2 at Proton AG organisational level. Strong for a consumer-facing privacy product. ISO 27701 would further strengthen the posture.
3/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
GLBNXT: Purpose-built for EU AI Act, GDPR, and NIS2 compliance; structural sovereignty
Lumo (Proton): Excellent fit for privacy-sensitive professionals in legal and financial services. Swiss jurisdiction, zero-access encryption, and no training on user data address key regulatory concerns. Not EU-incorporated but GDPR adequate.
5/5
4/5
Total Score
23/25
23/25

Best For

GLBNXT iconGLBNXT

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (BaFin, ICO); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Lumo (Proton) iconLumo (Proton)

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (legal, financial-services); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

GLBNXT vs Lumo (Proton): Trust & Compliance Comparison

GLBNXT (GLBNXT, NL) scores 23/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Europe's first sovereign AI platform beyond the reach of US cloud law. Lumo (Proton) (Proton, CH) scores 23/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Privacy-first AI assistant from the makers of ProtonMail, with Swiss jurisdiction and zero-access encryption.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

GLBNXT (5/5): EU-only infrastructure in the Netherlands; data physically cannot leave EU
Lumo (Proton) (5/5): Data hosted in Proton's own data centres in Germany and Norway. Zero-access encryption means even Proton cannot read conversation content. No US infrastructure dependency.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 5/5.

GLBNXT (5/5): Dutch B.V. under EU law; not subject to US CLOUD Act or FISA
Lumo (Proton) (5/5): Swiss incorporation provides one of the strongest privacy jurisdictions globally. Outside US CLOUD Act reach. Swiss FADP and GDPR adequacy. Proton has a decade-long track record of defending user privacy.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

GLBNXT (5/5): No training on customer data; sovereign-by-design data governance
Lumo (Proton) (5/5): Zero-access encryption on conversations. User data explicitly never used for model training. Open-source code enables independent verification of privacy claims.

#### Certifications

Lumo (Proton) leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

GLBNXT (3/5): ISO 27001 certified; additional certifications expected as company matures
Lumo (Proton) (4/5): ISO 27001 and SOC 2 at Proton AG organisational level. Strong for a consumer-facing privacy product. ISO 27701 would further strengthen the posture.

#### Regulatory Fit

GLBNXT leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

GLBNXT (5/5): Purpose-built for EU AI Act, GDPR, and NIS2 compliance; structural sovereignty
Lumo (Proton) (4/5): Excellent fit for privacy-sensitive professionals in legal and financial services. Swiss jurisdiction, zero-access encryption, and no training on user data address key regulatory concerns. Not EU-incorporated but GDPR adequate.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGLBNXTLumo (Proton)
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2NoYes

Overall Verdict

GLBNXT and Lumo (Proton) are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 23/25 and 23/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, GLBNXT or Lumo (Proton)?

GLBNXT has a TrustKit score of 23/25 while Lumo (Proton) scores 23/25. Both tools are currently rated equally across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do GLBNXT and Lumo (Proton) compare on data residency?

GLBNXT scores 5/5 for data residency (EU-only infrastructure in the Netherlands; data physically cannot leave EU), while Lumo (Proton) scores 5/5 (Data hosted in Proton's own data centres in Germany and Norway. Zero-access encryption means even Proton cannot read conversation content. No US infrastructure dependency.).

Are GLBNXT and Lumo (Proton) GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. GLBNXT has a regulatory fit score of 5/5 and Lumo (Proton) scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool