Greenhouse icon

Greenhouse

AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring

vs
HubSpot icon

HubSpot

AI-powered CRM platform for marketing, sales, and customer service

Greenhouse
64%Moderate
16/25
HubSpot
64%Moderate
16/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGreenhouseHubSpot
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Greenhouse: Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.
HubSpot: EU data hosting on AWS EU is available for Professional and Enterprise tiers but requires explicit configuration.
3/5
3/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Greenhouse: Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.
HubSpot: US-incorporated public company on the NYSE, subject to CLOUD Act, with SCCs available for EU data transfers.
3/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Greenhouse: Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.
HubSpot: Does not train AI models on customer CRM data; configurable data retention and deletion controls are available.
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Greenhouse: Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.
HubSpot: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, with a detailed sub-processor list and DPA available for all customers.
3/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Greenhouse: Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.
HubSpot: Adequate for most EU businesses when EU hosting is confirmed and DPA signed; regulated sectors should validate sub-processors.
3/5
3/5
Total Score
16/25
16/25

Best For

Greenhouse iconGreenhouse

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

HubSpot iconHubSpot

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Greenhouse vs HubSpot: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Greenhouse (Greenhouse Software, US) scores 16/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring. HubSpot (HubSpot, US) scores 16/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered CRM platform for marketing, sales, and customer service.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.
HubSpot (3/5): EU data hosting on AWS EU is available for Professional and Enterprise tiers but requires explicit configuration.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Greenhouse leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.
HubSpot (2/5): US-incorporated public company on the NYSE, subject to CLOUD Act, with SCCs available for EU data transfers.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Greenhouse (4/5): Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.
HubSpot (4/5): Does not train AI models on customer CRM data; configurable data retention and deletion controls are available.

#### Certifications

HubSpot leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.
HubSpot (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, with a detailed sub-processor list and DPA available for all customers.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.
HubSpot (3/5): Adequate for most EU businesses when EU hosting is confirmed and DPA signed; regulated sectors should validate sub-processors.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGreenhouseHubSpot
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Greenhouse and HubSpot are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 16/25 and 16/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Greenhouse or HubSpot?

Greenhouse has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while HubSpot scores 16/25. Both tools are currently rated equally across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Greenhouse and HubSpot compare on data residency?

Greenhouse scores 3/5 for data residency (Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.), while HubSpot scores 3/5 (EU data hosting on AWS EU is available for Professional and Enterprise tiers but requires explicit configuration.).

Are Greenhouse and HubSpot GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Greenhouse has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and HubSpot scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool