Greenhouse icon

Greenhouse

AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring

vs
Pigment icon

Pigment

AI-native business planning platform for finance, sales, and HR teams

Greenhouse
64%Moderate
16/25
Pigment
92%Excellent
23/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGreenhousePigment
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Greenhouse: Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.
Pigment: EU data centres; French company with EU-only processing
3/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Greenhouse: Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.
Pigment: French SAS under EU jurisdiction; not subject to US CLOUD Act
3/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Greenhouse: Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.
Pigment: No training on customer data; enterprise retention controls
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Greenhouse: Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.
Pigment: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified
3/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Greenhouse: Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.
Pigment: Excellent fit for EU financial services and regulated enterprise planning
3/5
5/5
Total Score
16/25
23/25

Best For

Greenhouse iconGreenhouse

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Pigment iconPigment

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (BaFin, AMF); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Detailed Comparison

Greenhouse vs Pigment: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Greenhouse (Greenhouse Software, US) scores 16/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring. Pigment (Pigment, FR) scores 23/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. AI-native business planning platform for finance, sales, and HR teams.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Pigment leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.
Pigment (5/5): EU data centres; French company with EU-only processing

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Pigment leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.
Pigment (5/5): French SAS under EU jurisdiction; not subject to US CLOUD Act

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Greenhouse (4/5): Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.
Pigment (4/5): No training on customer data; enterprise retention controls

#### Certifications

Pigment leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.
Pigment (4/5): SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified

#### Regulatory Fit

Pigment leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.
Pigment (5/5): Excellent fit for EU financial services and regulated enterprise planning

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGreenhousePigment
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Pigment has a clear trust advantage, scoring 23/25 compared to Greenhouse's 16/25. Pigment particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Greenhouse or Pigment?

Greenhouse has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Pigment scores 23/25. Pigment currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Greenhouse and Pigment compare on data residency?

Greenhouse scores 3/5 for data residency (Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.), while Pigment scores 5/5 (EU data centres; French company with EU-only processing).

Are Greenhouse and Pigment GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Greenhouse has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Pigment scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool