Greenhouse icon

Greenhouse

AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring

vs
Pipedrive icon

Pipedrive

Estonian-born CRM with AI-powered sales automation for European teams

Greenhouse
64%Moderate
16/25
Pipedrive
88%Excellent
22/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGreenhousePipedrive
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Greenhouse: Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.
Pipedrive: EU data residency available with data hosted on AWS Frankfurt; EU region is selectable for customers.
3/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Greenhouse: Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.
Pipedrive: Incorporated in Estonia as Pipedrive OÜ; operates fully under EU law with no US parent entity.
3/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Greenhouse: Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.
Pipedrive: Customer data is not used for AI training by default; configurable retention policies are available.
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Greenhouse: Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.
Pipedrive: Holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications demonstrating robust security controls.
3/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Greenhouse: Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.
Pipedrive: EU-incorporated with comprehensive GDPR tooling including DPA, data subject request support, and configurable retention.
3/5
5/5
Total Score
16/25
22/25

Best For

Greenhouse iconGreenhouse

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Pipedrive iconPipedrive

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (ICO, CNIL); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Detailed Comparison

Greenhouse vs Pipedrive: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Greenhouse (Greenhouse Software, US) scores 16/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered recruiting platform built for structured, bias-aware hiring. Pipedrive (Pipedrive, EE) scores 22/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Estonian-born CRM with AI-powered sales automation for European teams.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Pipedrive leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.
Pipedrive (4/5): EU data residency available with data hosted on AWS Frankfurt; EU region is selectable for customers.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Pipedrive leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to US legal frameworks. GDPR data processing agreements available for European customers handling candidate data.
Pipedrive (5/5): Incorporated in Estonia as Pipedrive OÜ; operates fully under EU law with no US parent entity.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Greenhouse (4/5): Configurable candidate data retention policies with GDPR-aligned deletion workflows. Candidate consent management features support lawful processing under EU data protection law.
Pipedrive (4/5): Customer data is not used for AI training by default; configurable retention policies are available.

#### Certifications

Pipedrive leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Solid baseline security posture for a recruitment platform handling sensitive candidate personal data.
Pipedrive (4/5): Holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications demonstrating robust security controls.

#### Regulatory Fit

Pipedrive leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Greenhouse (3/5): Good fit for organisations with structured hiring requirements and GDPR obligations. Candidate consent and data deletion features align with EU data protection requirements for HR data processing.
Pipedrive (5/5): EU-incorporated with comprehensive GDPR tooling including DPA, data subject request support, and configurable retention.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGreenhousePipedrive
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Pipedrive has a clear trust advantage, scoring 22/25 compared to Greenhouse's 16/25. Pipedrive particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Greenhouse or Pipedrive?

Greenhouse has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Pipedrive scores 22/25. Pipedrive currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Greenhouse and Pipedrive compare on data residency?

Greenhouse scores 3/5 for data residency (Data hosting available in US and EU. EU data residency supports GDPR compliance for European organisations managing candidate personal data.), while Pipedrive scores 4/5 (EU data residency available with data hosted on AWS Frankfurt; EU region is selectable for customers.).

Are Greenhouse and Pipedrive GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Greenhouse has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Pipedrive scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool