Nebius AI icon

Nebius AI

European GPU cloud and LLM inference platform built for AI-native businesses

vs
Groq icon

Groq

Ultra-fast LPU inference for open-source LLMs at developer-friendly pricing

Nebius AI
80%Strong
20/25
Groq
40%Caution
10/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionNebius AIGroq
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Nebius AI: Data centres located in Finland and the Netherlands—both EU member states. Inference and compute workloads remain within EU borders. Strong data residency story for European AI builders.
Groq: All inference processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option available as of early 2026. European businesses processing personal data via the Groq API must implement GDPR transfer mechanisms.
5/5
1/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Nebius AI: Incorporated as Nebius Group N.V. under Dutch law. EU legal jurisdiction applies, with no CLOUD Act exposure. Corporate history as Yandex spin-off warrants due diligence on ownership structure, but current governance is EU-based.
Groq: Groq Inc. incorporated in California, subject to US law including the CLOUD Act. GDPR-compliant DPA available contractually, but US legal jurisdiction is the governing framework. No EU parent company or subsidiary structure.
4/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Nebius AI: Customer inference requests and training data are not used to train shared models. Tenant isolation architecture. GDPR-compliant data processing posture with configurable retention for enterprise customers.
Groq: Groq's privacy policy states that inference request data is not used for model training. Minimal data retention for API calls. Suitable for non-personal-data inference use cases; personal data processing requires GDPR transfer mechanism.
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Nebius AI: ISO 27001 certification in place. As a relatively new independent entity, the broader certification portfolio (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27701) is still developing. Expect maturation over 2025-2026.
Groq: No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or other independent security certifications as of early 2026. Privacy and security practices are self-attested. This is a significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.
3/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Nebius AI: Excellent fit for European organisations building AI applications and needing EU-sovereign inference infrastructure. Dutch incorporation, EU data centres, and GDPR-compliant DPA make this suitable for most regulated EU use cases. Financial services and healthcare organisations should review specifics with Nebius.
Groq: Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without appropriate SCCs and transfer impact assessment. Good option for non-personal-data use cases (e.g., inference on internal documents with no personal data). Not recommended for regulated EU industries without significant additional controls.
4/5
2/5
Total Score
20/25
10/25

Best For

Nebius AI iconNebius AI

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Groq iconGroq

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (CNIL, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Groq vs Nebius AI: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Groq (Groq, US) scores 10/25 overall with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. Ultra-fast LPU inference for open-source LLMs at developer-friendly pricing. Nebius AI (Nebius, NL) scores 20/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. European GPU cloud and LLM inference platform built for AI-native businesses.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Nebius AI leads with 5/5 vs 1/5.

Groq (1/5): All inference processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option available as of early 2026. European businesses processing personal data via the Groq API must implement GDPR transfer mechanisms.
Nebius AI (5/5): Data centres located in Finland and the Netherlands—both EU member states. Inference and compute workloads remain within EU borders. Strong data residency story for European AI builders.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Nebius AI leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Groq (2/5): Groq Inc. incorporated in California, subject to US law including the CLOUD Act. GDPR-compliant DPA available contractually, but US legal jurisdiction is the governing framework. No EU parent company or subsidiary structure.
Nebius AI (4/5): Incorporated as Nebius Group N.V. under Dutch law. EU legal jurisdiction applies, with no CLOUD Act exposure. Corporate history as Yandex spin-off warrants due diligence on ownership structure, but current governance is EU-based.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Groq (4/5): Groq's privacy policy states that inference request data is not used for model training. Minimal data retention for API calls. Suitable for non-personal-data inference use cases; personal data processing requires GDPR transfer mechanism.
Nebius AI (4/5): Customer inference requests and training data are not used to train shared models. Tenant isolation architecture. GDPR-compliant data processing posture with configurable retention for enterprise customers.

#### Certifications

Nebius AI leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Groq (1/5): No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or other independent security certifications as of early 2026. Privacy and security practices are self-attested. This is a significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.
Nebius AI (3/5): ISO 27001 certification in place. As a relatively new independent entity, the broader certification portfolio (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27701) is still developing. Expect maturation over 2025-2026.

#### Regulatory Fit

Nebius AI leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Groq (2/5): Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without appropriate SCCs and transfer impact assessment. Good option for non-personal-data use cases (e.g., inference on internal documents with no personal data). Not recommended for regulated EU industries without significant additional controls.
Nebius AI (4/5): Excellent fit for European organisations building AI applications and needing EU-sovereign inference infrastructure. Dutch incorporation, EU data centres, and GDPR-compliant DPA make this suitable for most regulated EU use cases. Financial services and healthcare organisations should review specifics with Nebius.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGroqNebius AI
ISO 27001NoYes

Overall Verdict

Nebius AI has a clear trust advantage, scoring 20/25 compared to Groq's 10/25. Nebius AI particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Nebius AI or Groq?

Nebius AI has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while Groq scores 10/25. Nebius AI currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Nebius AI and Groq compare on data residency?

Nebius AI scores 5/5 for data residency (Data centres located in Finland and the Netherlands—both EU member states. Inference and compute workloads remain within EU borders. Strong data residency story for European AI builders.), while Groq scores 1/5 (All inference processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option available as of early 2026. European businesses processing personal data via the Groq API must implement GDPR transfer mechanisms.).

Are Nebius AI and Groq GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Nebius AI has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Groq scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool