HappyScribe icon

HappyScribe

European AI transcription and subtitling platform with EU data hosting

vs
Lumo (Proton) icon

Lumo (Proton)

Privacy-first AI assistant from the makers of ProtonMail, with Swiss jurisdiction and zero-access encryption

HappyScribe
72%Strong
18/25
Lumo (Proton)
92%Excellent
23/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionHappyScribeLumo (Proton)
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
HappyScribe: EU GDPR-compliant data hosting. Irish incorporation ensures EU jurisdiction. Audio and transcript data stays within EU infrastructure.
Lumo (Proton): Data hosted in Proton's own data centres in Germany and Norway. Zero-access encryption means even Proton cannot read conversation content. No US infrastructure dependency.
4/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
HappyScribe: Irish Limited company under EU law. Full GDPR coverage. Ireland is an EU member state with strong data protection framework under the DPC.
Lumo (Proton): Swiss incorporation provides one of the strongest privacy jurisdictions globally. Outside US CLOUD Act reach. Swiss FADP and GDPR adequacy. Proton has a decade-long track record of defending user privacy.
4/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
HappyScribe: Training data practices not explicitly disclosed. SOC 2 Type II suggests formal data handling procedures. Audio data handling policies should be reviewed for sensitive content.
Lumo (Proton): Zero-access encryption on conversations. User data explicitly never used for model training. Open-source code enables independent verification of privacy claims.
3/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
HappyScribe: SOC 2 Type II certified—strong for a transcription service. Demonstrates formal security controls and independent audit. ISO 27001 would further strengthen the posture.
Lumo (Proton): ISO 27001 and SOC 2 at Proton AG organisational level. Strong for a consumer-facing privacy product. ISO 27701 would further strengthen the posture.
4/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
HappyScribe: Good for general business use. SOC 2 and EU hosting support enterprise requirements. Not specifically designed for highly regulated industries but suitable for general compliance needs.
Lumo (Proton): Excellent fit for privacy-sensitive professionals in legal and financial services. Swiss jurisdiction, zero-access encryption, and no training on user data address key regulatory concerns. Not EU-incorporated but GDPR adequate.
3/5
4/5
Total Score
18/25
23/25

Best For

HappyScribe iconHappyScribe

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty.

Lumo (Proton) iconLumo (Proton)

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (legal, financial-services); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

HappyScribe vs Lumo (Proton): Trust & Compliance Comparison

HappyScribe (HappyScribe, ES) scores 18/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. European AI transcription and subtitling platform with EU data hosting. Lumo (Proton) (Proton, CH) scores 23/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Privacy-first AI assistant from the makers of ProtonMail, with Swiss jurisdiction and zero-access encryption.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Lumo (Proton) leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

HappyScribe (4/5): EU GDPR-compliant data hosting. Irish incorporation ensures EU jurisdiction. Audio and transcript data stays within EU infrastructure.
Lumo (Proton) (5/5): Data hosted in Proton's own data centres in Germany and Norway. Zero-access encryption means even Proton cannot read conversation content. No US infrastructure dependency.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Lumo (Proton) leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

HappyScribe (4/5): Irish Limited company under EU law. Full GDPR coverage. Ireland is an EU member state with strong data protection framework under the DPC.
Lumo (Proton) (5/5): Swiss incorporation provides one of the strongest privacy jurisdictions globally. Outside US CLOUD Act reach. Swiss FADP and GDPR adequacy. Proton has a decade-long track record of defending user privacy.

#### Data Retention & Training

Lumo (Proton) leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

HappyScribe (3/5): Training data practices not explicitly disclosed. SOC 2 Type II suggests formal data handling procedures. Audio data handling policies should be reviewed for sensitive content.
Lumo (Proton) (5/5): Zero-access encryption on conversations. User data explicitly never used for model training. Open-source code enables independent verification of privacy claims.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 4/5.

HappyScribe (4/5): SOC 2 Type II certified—strong for a transcription service. Demonstrates formal security controls and independent audit. ISO 27001 would further strengthen the posture.
Lumo (Proton) (4/5): ISO 27001 and SOC 2 at Proton AG organisational level. Strong for a consumer-facing privacy product. ISO 27701 would further strengthen the posture.

#### Regulatory Fit

Lumo (Proton) leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

HappyScribe (3/5): Good for general business use. SOC 2 and EU hosting support enterprise requirements. Not specifically designed for highly regulated industries but suitable for general compliance needs.
Lumo (Proton) (4/5): Excellent fit for privacy-sensitive professionals in legal and financial services. Swiss jurisdiction, zero-access encryption, and no training on user data address key regulatory concerns. Not EU-incorporated but GDPR adequate.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationHappyScribeLumo (Proton)
ISO 27001NoYes
SOC 2NoYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

Lumo (Proton) has a clear trust advantage, scoring 23/25 compared to HappyScribe's 18/25. Lumo (Proton) particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, HappyScribe or Lumo (Proton)?

HappyScribe has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Lumo (Proton) scores 23/25. Lumo (Proton) currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do HappyScribe and Lumo (Proton) compare on data residency?

HappyScribe scores 4/5 for data residency (EU GDPR-compliant data hosting. Irish incorporation ensures EU jurisdiction. Audio and transcript data stays within EU infrastructure.), while Lumo (Proton) scores 5/5 (Data hosted in Proton's own data centres in Germany and Norway. Zero-access encryption means even Proton cannot read conversation content. No US infrastructure dependency.).

Are HappyScribe and Lumo (Proton) GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. HappyScribe has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Lumo (Proton) scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool