Intercom icon

Intercom

AI-first customer service platform with the Fin AI agent

vs
LivePerson icon

LivePerson

US enterprise conversational AI platform for digital customer engagement at scale

Intercom
64%Moderate
16/25
LivePerson
68%Strong
17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionIntercomLivePerson
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Intercom: EU data hosting in Frankfurt (AWS) is available on qualifying plans but is not the default and must be requested.
LivePerson: EU data residency available (AWS Frankfurt); long-standing European enterprise deployments with documented EU hosting
3/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Intercom: US-incorporated under Delaware law and subject to CLOUD Act; SCCs are available but US jurisdiction is a residual risk.
LivePerson: Public US Delaware corporation; CLOUD Act applies; strong SCCs and DPAs mitigate but cannot eliminate US jurisdiction
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Intercom: No training on customer conversations; configurable data retention and deletion controls available.
LivePerson: Opt-out from conversation data training available; enterprise-grade retention controls; review AI feature terms
4/5
3/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Intercom: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications, providing strong assurance for enterprise customers.
LivePerson: ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II — solid for an enterprise contact centre platform; NIS2 and DORA documentation available
4/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Intercom: Adequate for EU businesses with a DPA in place and EU hosting confirmed; additional due diligence advised for regulated sectors.
LivePerson: Mature EU compliance posture; EU hosting, ISO 27001, DPA, and NIS2/DORA readiness make it viable for regulated sectors
3/5
4/5
Total Score
16/25
17/25

Best For

Intercom iconIntercom

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

LivePerson iconLivePerson

Best for regulated industries (ICO, CNIL).

Detailed Comparison

Intercom vs LivePerson: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Intercom (Intercom, US) scores 16/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-first customer service platform with the Fin AI agent. LivePerson (LivePerson, US) scores 17/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. US enterprise conversational AI platform for digital customer engagement at scale.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

LivePerson leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Intercom (3/5): EU data hosting in Frankfurt (AWS) is available on qualifying plans but is not the default and must be requested.
LivePerson (4/5): EU data residency available (AWS Frankfurt); long-standing European enterprise deployments with documented EU hosting

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

Intercom (2/5): US-incorporated under Delaware law and subject to CLOUD Act; SCCs are available but US jurisdiction is a residual risk.
LivePerson (2/5): Public US Delaware corporation; CLOUD Act applies; strong SCCs and DPAs mitigate but cannot eliminate US jurisdiction

#### Data Retention & Training

Intercom leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Intercom (4/5): No training on customer conversations; configurable data retention and deletion controls available.
LivePerson (3/5): Opt-out from conversation data training available; enterprise-grade retention controls; review AI feature terms

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 4/5.

Intercom (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications, providing strong assurance for enterprise customers.
LivePerson (4/5): ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II — solid for an enterprise contact centre platform; NIS2 and DORA documentation available

#### Regulatory Fit

LivePerson leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Intercom (3/5): Adequate for EU businesses with a DPA in place and EU hosting confirmed; additional due diligence advised for regulated sectors.
LivePerson (4/5): Mature EU compliance posture; EU hosting, ISO 27001, DPA, and NIS2/DORA readiness make it viable for regulated sectors

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationIntercomLivePerson
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Intercom and LivePerson are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 16/25 and 17/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Intercom or LivePerson?

Intercom has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while LivePerson scores 17/25. LivePerson currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Intercom and LivePerson compare on data residency?

Intercom scores 3/5 for data residency (EU data hosting in Frankfurt (AWS) is available on qualifying plans but is not the default and must be requested.), while LivePerson scores 4/5 (EU data residency available (AWS Frankfurt); long-standing European enterprise deployments with documented EU hosting).

Are Intercom and LivePerson GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Intercom has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and LivePerson scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool