Langfuse
Open-source LLM observability and engineering platform for tracing, evaluation, and prompt management
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls
Score Breakdown
Best For
Best for regulated industries (BaFin, CNIL); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.
Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.
Detailed Comparison
Langfuse vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison
Langfuse (Langfuse (ClickHouse), DE) scores 22/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Open-source LLM observability and engineering platform for tracing, evaluation, and prompt management. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.
Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown
#### Data Residency
Langfuse leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.
#### Legal Jurisdiction
Both score equally at 3/5.
#### Data Retention & Training
Both score equally at 5/5.
#### Certifications
Langfuse leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.
#### Regulatory Fit
Langfuse leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.
Certifications at a Glance
| Certification | Langfuse | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes | Yes |
Overall Verdict
Langfuse has a clear trust advantage, scoring 22/25 compared to Sourcegraph Cody's 18/25. Langfuse particularly excels in data residency, certifications, regulatory fit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for EU compliance, Langfuse or Sourcegraph Cody?
Langfuse has a TrustKit score of 22/25 while Sourcegraph Cody scores 18/25. Langfuse currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.
How do Langfuse and Sourcegraph Cody compare on data residency?
Langfuse scores 5/5 for data residency (EU cloud region (Ireland) keeps data within EEA. Full self-hosting option allows air-gapped EU deployments with zero cloud dependency. Customer can choose exact data location.), while Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.).
Are Langfuse and Sourcegraph Cody GDPR compliant?
Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Langfuse has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.