Rasa icon

Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

vs
Nebius AI icon

Nebius AI

European GPU cloud and LLM inference platform built for AI-native businesses

Rasa
76%Strong
19/25
Nebius AI
80%Strong
20/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionRasaNebius AI
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
Nebius AI: Data centres located in Finland and the Netherlands—both EU member states. Inference and compute workloads remain within EU borders. Strong data residency story for European AI builders.
5/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
Nebius AI: Incorporated as Nebius Group N.V. under Dutch law. EU legal jurisdiction applies, with no CLOUD Act exposure. Corporate history as Yandex spin-off warrants due diligence on ownership structure, but current governance is EU-based.
3/5
4/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
Nebius AI: Customer inference requests and training data are not used to train shared models. Tenant isolation architecture. GDPR-compliant data processing posture with configurable retention for enterprise customers.
5/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
Nebius AI: ISO 27001 certification in place. As a relatively new independent entity, the broader certification portfolio (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27701) is still developing. Expect maturation over 2025-2026.
2/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
Nebius AI: Excellent fit for European organisations building AI applications and needing EU-sovereign inference infrastructure. Dutch incorporation, EU data centres, and GDPR-compliant DPA make this suitable for most regulated EU use cases. Financial services and healthcare organisations should review specifics with Nebius.
4/5
4/5
Total Score
19/25
20/25

Best For

Rasa iconRasa

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (CNIL, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Nebius AI iconNebius AI

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Nebius AI vs Rasa: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Nebius AI (Nebius, NL) scores 20/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. European GPU cloud and LLM inference platform built for AI-native businesses. Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

Nebius AI (5/5): Data centres located in Finland and the Netherlands—both EU member states. Inference and compute workloads remain within EU borders. Strong data residency story for European AI builders.
Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Nebius AI leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Nebius AI (4/5): Incorporated as Nebius Group N.V. under Dutch law. EU legal jurisdiction applies, with no CLOUD Act exposure. Corporate history as Yandex spin-off warrants due diligence on ownership structure, but current governance is EU-based.
Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

#### Data Retention & Training

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Nebius AI (4/5): Customer inference requests and training data are not used to train shared models. Tenant isolation architecture. GDPR-compliant data processing posture with configurable retention for enterprise customers.
Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

#### Certifications

Nebius AI leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Nebius AI (3/5): ISO 27001 certification in place. As a relatively new independent entity, the broader certification portfolio (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27701) is still developing. Expect maturation over 2025-2026.
Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

Nebius AI (4/5): Excellent fit for European organisations building AI applications and needing EU-sovereign inference infrastructure. Dutch incorporation, EU data centres, and GDPR-compliant DPA make this suitable for most regulated EU use cases. Financial services and healthcare organisations should review specifics with Nebius.
Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationNebius AIRasa
ISO 27001YesNo

Overall Verdict

Nebius AI and Rasa are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 20/25 and 19/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Rasa or Nebius AI?

Rasa has a TrustKit score of 19/25 while Nebius AI scores 20/25. Nebius AI currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Rasa and Nebius AI compare on data residency?

Rasa scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.), while Nebius AI scores 5/5 (Data centres located in Finland and the Netherlands—both EU member states. Inference and compute workloads remain within EU borders. Strong data residency story for European AI builders.).

Are Rasa and Nebius AI GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Rasa has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Nebius AI scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool