Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls

Phind

AI search engine and coding assistant built for developers

Sourcegraph Cody

Strong

18/25

Phind

Caution

11/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionSourcegraph CodyPhind

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Sourcegraph Cody: Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

Phind: Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.

3/5

Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

2/5

Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Sourcegraph Cody: US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

Phind: US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act. No EU legal entity.

3/5

US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

2/5

US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act. No EU legal entity.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Sourcegraph Cody: Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

Phind: Users can opt out of data being used for model training. Search history can be deleted. Reasonable privacy controls for a developer tool.

5/5

Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

3/5

Users can opt out of data being used for model training. Search history can be deleted. Reasonable privacy controls for a developer tool.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Sourcegraph Cody: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

Phind: No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup without formal compliance programme.

4/5

Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

2/5

No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup without formal compliance programme.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Sourcegraph Cody: Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Phind: Suitable for general developer use but lacks enterprise compliance features for regulated industries. No DPA or audit capabilities offered.

3/5

Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

2/5

Suitable for general developer use but lacks enterprise compliance features for regulated industries. No DPA or audit capabilities offered.

Total Score

18/25

11/25

Best For

Sourcegraph Cody

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Phind

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Phind vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Phind (Phind, US) scores 11/25 overall with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI search engine and coding assistant built for developers. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Phind (2/5): Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Phind (2/5): US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act. No EU legal entity.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

#### Data Retention & Training

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●Phind (3/5): Users can opt out of data being used for model training. Search history can be deleted. Reasonable privacy controls for a developer tool.

●Sourcegraph Cody (5/5): Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

#### Certifications

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

●Phind (2/5): No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup without formal compliance programme.

●Sourcegraph Cody (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Phind (2/5): Suitable for general developer use but lacks enterprise compliance features for regulated industries. No DPA or audit capabilities offered.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	Phind	Sourcegraph Cody
ISO 27001	No	Yes
SOC 2 Type II	No	Yes

Overall Verdict

Sourcegraph Cody has a clear trust advantage, scoring 18/25 compared to Phind's 11/25. Sourcegraph Cody particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Phind?

Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Phind scores 11/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Sourcegraph Cody and Phind compare on data residency?

Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Phind scores 2/5 (Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.).

Are Sourcegraph Cody and Phind GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Phind scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool