Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls

Pieces for Developers

AI-powered developer productivity tool with on-device copilot and snippet management

Sourcegraph Cody

Strong

18/25

Pieces for Developers

Moderate

14/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionSourcegraph CodyPieces for Developers

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Sourcegraph Cody: Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

Pieces for Developers: Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.

3/5

Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

3/5

Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Sourcegraph Cody: US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

Pieces for Developers: US entity. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, local-first architecture minimises jurisdictional data concerns.

3/5

US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

2/5

US entity. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, local-first architecture minimises jurisdictional data concerns.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Sourcegraph Cody: Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

Pieces for Developers: Local-first by default — all data stored on the user's device. No cloud required for core functionality. Full user control over data retention.

5/5

Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

4/5

Local-first by default — all data stored on the user's device. No cloud required for core functionality. Full user control over data retention.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Sourcegraph Cody: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

Pieces for Developers: No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Local-first architecture reduces reliance on cloud certifications.

4/5

Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

2/5

No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Local-first architecture reduces reliance on cloud certifications.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Sourcegraph Cody: Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Pieces for Developers: On-device processing makes it suitable for environments with strict data governance. No data leaves the device in local mode, addressing many regulatory concerns.

3/5

Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

3/5

On-device processing makes it suitable for environments with strict data governance. No data leaves the device in local mode, addressing many regulatory concerns.

Total Score

18/25

14/25

Best For

Sourcegraph Cody

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Pieces for Developers

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Pieces for Developers vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Pieces for Developers (Pieces for Developers, US) scores 14/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-powered developer productivity tool with on-device copilot and snippet management. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 3/5.

●Pieces for Developers (3/5): Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Pieces for Developers (2/5): US entity. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, local-first architecture minimises jurisdictional data concerns.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

#### Data Retention & Training

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Pieces for Developers (4/5): Local-first by default — all data stored on the user's device. No cloud required for core functionality. Full user control over data retention.

●Sourcegraph Cody (5/5): Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

#### Certifications

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

●Pieces for Developers (2/5): No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Local-first architecture reduces reliance on cloud certifications.

●Sourcegraph Cody (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 3/5.

●Pieces for Developers (3/5): On-device processing makes it suitable for environments with strict data governance. No data leaves the device in local mode, addressing many regulatory concerns.

●Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	Pieces for Developers	Sourcegraph Cody
ISO 27001	No	Yes
SOC 2 Type II	No	Yes

Overall Verdict

Sourcegraph Cody has a clear trust advantage, scoring 18/25 compared to Pieces for Developers's 14/25. Sourcegraph Cody particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Pieces for Developers?

Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Pieces for Developers scores 14/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Sourcegraph Cody and Pieces for Developers compare on data residency?

Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Pieces for Developers scores 3/5 (Local-first architecture allows on-device processing with no cloud dependency. When cloud features are used, data goes to US-based infrastructure.).

Are Sourcegraph Cody and Pieces for Developers GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Pieces for Developers scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool

Sourcegraph Cody

View full review →

72%

Pieces for Developers

View full review →

56%