Rasa icon

Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

vs
Prediction Guard icon

Prediction Guard

Privacy-first LLM API with built-in compliance and safety controls

Rasa
76%Strong
19/25
Prediction Guard
80%Strong
20/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionRasaPrediction Guard
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
Prediction Guard: Offers EU deployment options alongside US hosting. VPC and on-premise deployments available for full data sovereignty. Flexible hosting model.
5/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
Prediction Guard: US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, on-premise deployment mitigates many jurisdiction concerns for EU customers.
3/5
3/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
Prediction Guard: No customer data used for training. Built-in PII redaction. Configurable data retention. On-premise option means data never leaves customer infrastructure.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
Prediction Guard: SOC 2 Type II certified. HIPAA BAA available. Strong compliance posture for a startup. No ISO 27001 yet.
2/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
Prediction Guard: Purpose-built for regulated industries. HIPAA compliant for healthcare. Safety controls address key regulatory concerns around AI outputs in sensitive contexts.
4/5
4/5
Total Score
19/25
20/25

Best For

Rasa iconRasa

Best for regulated industries (HHS, FDA); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment.

Prediction Guard iconPrediction Guard

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Prediction Guard vs Rasa: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Prediction Guard (Prediction Guard, US) scores 20/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Privacy-first LLM API with built-in compliance and safety controls. Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Prediction Guard (4/5): Offers EU deployment options alongside US hosting. VPC and on-premise deployments available for full data sovereignty. Flexible hosting model.
Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 3/5.

Prediction Guard (3/5): US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction. However, on-premise deployment mitigates many jurisdiction concerns for EU customers.
Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Prediction Guard (5/5): No customer data used for training. Built-in PII redaction. Configurable data retention. On-premise option means data never leaves customer infrastructure.
Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

#### Certifications

Prediction Guard leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Prediction Guard (4/5): SOC 2 Type II certified. HIPAA BAA available. Strong compliance posture for a startup. No ISO 27001 yet.
Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

Prediction Guard (4/5): Purpose-built for regulated industries. HIPAA compliant for healthcare. Safety controls address key regulatory concerns around AI outputs in sensitive contexts.
Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationPrediction GuardRasa
HIPAA BAAYesNo
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

Prediction Guard and Rasa are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 20/25 and 19/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Rasa or Prediction Guard?

Rasa has a TrustKit score of 19/25 while Prediction Guard scores 20/25. Prediction Guard currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Rasa and Prediction Guard compare on data residency?

Rasa scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.), while Prediction Guard scores 4/5 (Offers EU deployment options alongside US hosting. VPC and on-premise deployments available for full data sovereignty. Flexible hosting model.).

Are Rasa and Prediction Guard GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Rasa has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Prediction Guard scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool