Sourcegraph Cody icon

Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls

vs
Qodo icon

Qodo

AI code review and testing tool with agentic workflows for quality assurance

Sourcegraph Cody
72%Strong
18/25
Qodo
68%Strong
17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionSourcegraph CodyQodo
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Sourcegraph Cody: Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.
Qodo: Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.
3/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Sourcegraph Cody: US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.
Qodo: Israeli company with adequate GDPR data transfer status. On-premise deployment mitigates jurisdiction concerns. Not subject to US CLOUD Act as primary entity.
3/5
3/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Sourcegraph Cody: Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.
Qodo: Code not used for training. Self-hosted option means code never leaves customer infrastructure. Clear data handling policies.
5/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Sourcegraph Cody: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.
Qodo: SOC 2 Type II certified. GDPR compliant. Strong security posture for a development tool. No ISO 27001.
4/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Sourcegraph Cody: Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.
Qodo: Self-hosted deployment suitable for regulated industries. SOC 2 certified. Good fit for financial services and enterprises with strict code security requirements.
3/5
3/5
Total Score
18/25
17/25

Best For

Sourcegraph Cody iconSourcegraph Cody

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Qodo iconQodo

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Qodo vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Qodo (Qodo, IL) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI code review and testing tool with agentic workflows for quality assurance. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Qodo leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Qodo (4/5): Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 3/5.

Qodo (3/5): Israeli company with adequate GDPR data transfer status. On-premise deployment mitigates jurisdiction concerns. Not subject to US CLOUD Act as primary entity.
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

#### Data Retention & Training

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Qodo (4/5): Code not used for training. Self-hosted option means code never leaves customer infrastructure. Clear data handling policies.
Sourcegraph Cody (5/5): Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

#### Certifications

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Qodo (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified. GDPR compliant. Strong security posture for a development tool. No ISO 27001.
Sourcegraph Cody (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 3/5.

Qodo (3/5): Self-hosted deployment suitable for regulated industries. SOC 2 certified. Good fit for financial services and enterprises with strict code security requirements.
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationQodoSourcegraph Cody
GDPR DPAYesNo
ISO 27001NoYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Qodo and Sourcegraph Cody are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 17/25 and 18/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Qodo?

Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Qodo scores 17/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Sourcegraph Cody and Qodo compare on data residency?

Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Qodo scores 4/5 (Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.).

Are Sourcegraph Cody and Qodo GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Qodo scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool