Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

SiteGPT

AI customer support chatbot trained on your website content

Rasa

Strong

19/25

SiteGPT

Caution

9/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionRasaSiteGPT

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

SiteGPT: US-based hosting only. No EU data residency option. Website content and conversations stored on US infrastructure.

5/5

Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

2/5

US-based hosting only. No EU data residency option. Website content and conversations stored on US infrastructure.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

SiteGPT: US company subject to US jurisdiction. Basic privacy policy. No dedicated GDPR DPA publicised.

3/5

Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

2/5

US company subject to US jurisdiction. Basic privacy policy. No dedicated GDPR DPA publicised.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

SiteGPT: Website content used only for the customer's own chatbot. Conversation logs retained for analytics. No cross-customer data sharing.

5/5

Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

3/5

Website content used only for the customer's own chatbot. Conversation logs retained for analytics. No cross-customer data sharing.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

SiteGPT: No security certifications disclosed. Early-stage product without enterprise compliance infrastructure.

2/5

Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

1/5

No security certifications disclosed. Early-stage product without enterprise compliance infrastructure.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

SiteGPT: Not suitable for regulated industries. No compliance certifications. Best for general business customer support where regulatory requirements are minimal.

4/5

Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

1/5

Not suitable for regulated industries. No compliance certifications. Best for general business customer support where regulatory requirements are minimal.

Total Score

19/25

9/25

Best For

Rasa

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

SiteGPT

Best for teams that prioritise data retention & training (scores 3/5) and need a review required-tier tool.

Detailed Comparison

Rasa vs SiteGPT: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants. SiteGPT (SiteGPT, US) scores 9/25 with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI customer support chatbot trained on your website content.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 2/5.

●Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

●SiteGPT (2/5): US-based hosting only. No EU data residency option. Website content and conversations stored on US infrastructure.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Rasa leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

●SiteGPT (2/5): US company subject to US jurisdiction. Basic privacy policy. No dedicated GDPR DPA publicised.

#### Data Retention & Training

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

●SiteGPT (3/5): Website content used only for the customer's own chatbot. Conversation logs retained for analytics. No cross-customer data sharing.

#### Certifications

Rasa leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

●Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

●SiteGPT (1/5): No security certifications disclosed. Early-stage product without enterprise compliance infrastructure.

#### Regulatory Fit

Rasa leads with 4/5 vs 1/5.

●Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

●SiteGPT (1/5): Not suitable for regulated industries. No compliance certifications. Best for general business customer support where regulatory requirements are minimal.

Overall Verdict

Rasa has a clear trust advantage, scoring 19/25 compared to SiteGPT's 9/25. Rasa particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Rasa or SiteGPT?

Rasa has a TrustKit score of 19/25 while SiteGPT scores 9/25. Rasa currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Rasa and SiteGPT compare on data residency?

Rasa scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.), while SiteGPT scores 2/5 (US-based hosting only. No EU data residency option. Website content and conversations stored on US infrastructure.).

Are Rasa and SiteGPT GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Rasa has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and SiteGPT scores 1/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool