Tiledesk icon

Tiledesk

Open-source AI agent builder for customer support with self-hosting option — made in Italy

vs
Rasa icon

Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

Tiledesk
80%Strong
20/25
Rasa
76%Strong
19/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionTiledeskRasa
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Tiledesk: Open-source with self-hosting: customer conversations stay entirely on your own infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.
Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
5/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Tiledesk: Italian SRL, fully under EU law. No US parent or investor control. GDPR applies natively.
Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
5/5
3/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Tiledesk: Self-hosted deployment gives complete control over data lifecycle. No data leaves the organisation's infrastructure. Open-source code is auditable.
Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Tiledesk: No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications. Early-stage company. The open-source/self-hosted model partially compensates as organisations can apply their own security controls.
Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
1/5
2/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Tiledesk: EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Ideal for organisations that can manage their own infrastructure and need maximum data control. Certification gaps may block enterprise procurement that requires SOC 2.
Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
4/5
4/5
Total Score
20/25
19/25

Best For

Tiledesk iconTiledesk

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Rasa iconRasa

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Rasa vs Tiledesk: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants. Tiledesk (Tiledesk, IT) scores 20/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source AI agent builder for customer support with self-hosting option — made in Italy.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
Tiledesk (5/5): Open-source with self-hosting: customer conversations stay entirely on your own infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Tiledesk leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
Tiledesk (5/5): Italian SRL, fully under EU law. No US parent or investor control. GDPR applies natively.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
Tiledesk (5/5): Self-hosted deployment gives complete control over data lifecycle. No data leaves the organisation's infrastructure. Open-source code is auditable.

#### Certifications

Rasa leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
Tiledesk (1/5): No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications. Early-stage company. The open-source/self-hosted model partially compensates as organisations can apply their own security controls.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
Tiledesk (4/5): EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Ideal for organisations that can manage their own infrastructure and need maximum data control. Certification gaps may block enterprise procurement that requires SOC 2.

Overall Verdict

Rasa and Tiledesk are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 19/25 and 20/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Tiledesk or Rasa?

Tiledesk has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while Rasa scores 19/25. Tiledesk currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Tiledesk and Rasa compare on data residency?

Tiledesk scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source with self-hosting: customer conversations stay entirely on your own infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.), while Rasa scores 5/5 (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.).

Are Tiledesk and Rasa GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Tiledesk has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Rasa scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool