Rasa icon

Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

vs
Typeform icon

Typeform

Conversational forms and surveys with AI-powered features

Rasa
76%Strong
19/25
Typeform
80%Strong
20/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionRasaTypeform
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
Typeform: Customer data is hosted on AWS EU infrastructure by default, providing a clear EU data residency story.
5/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
Typeform: Incorporated as a Spanish SL under EU law with no US parent company, meaning no CLOUD Act exposure.
3/5
5/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
Typeform: No AI training on user data; configurable data retention and deletion available to customers.
5/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
Typeform: Holds SOC 2 Type II certification; ISO 27001 is not currently listed on their trust page.
2/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
Typeform: Strong fit for EU regulated businesses due to EU incorporation, EU data residency, and DPA availability.
4/5
4/5
Total Score
19/25
20/25

Best For

Rasa iconRasa

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Typeform iconTypeform

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (AEPD, ICO); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Rasa vs Typeform: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants. Typeform (Typeform, ES) scores 20/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Conversational forms and surveys with AI-powered features.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.
Typeform (4/5): Customer data is hosted on AWS EU infrastructure by default, providing a clear EU data residency story.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Typeform leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.
Typeform (5/5): Incorporated as a Spanish SL under EU law with no US parent company, meaning no CLOUD Act exposure.

#### Data Retention & Training

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.
Typeform (4/5): No AI training on user data; configurable data retention and deletion available to customers.

#### Certifications

Typeform leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.
Typeform (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II certification; ISO 27001 is not currently listed on their trust page.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.
Typeform (4/5): Strong fit for EU regulated businesses due to EU incorporation, EU data residency, and DPA availability.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationRasaTypeform
GDPRNoYes
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Rasa and Typeform are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 19/25 and 20/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Rasa or Typeform?

Rasa has a TrustKit score of 19/25 while Typeform scores 20/25. Typeform currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Rasa and Typeform compare on data residency?

Rasa scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.), while Typeform scores 4/5 (Customer data is hosted on AWS EU infrastructure by default, providing a clear EU data residency story.).

Are Rasa and Typeform GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Rasa has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Typeform scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool