Cogram icon

Cogram

AI meeting assistant that takes notes and identifies action items

vs
Metaview icon

Metaview

AI recruiting platform for interview notes and hiring insights

Cogram
84%Strong
21/25
Metaview
72%Strong
18/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionCogramMetaview
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Cogram: German company with EU-based cloud infrastructure. Data processed and stored within the EU. Strong data sovereignty positioning for European customers.
Metaview: Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.
5/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Cogram: German GmbH subject to EU/German data protection law. GDPR-native company. Not subject to US CLOUD Act or FISA.
Metaview: UK incorporated (Metaview Global Limited, England and Wales) with no US parent identified; subject to UK GDPR rather than EU/EEA jurisdiction.
5/5
4/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Cogram: Meeting data not used for training. Clear retention policies. Users can delete meeting data. Enterprise data management controls available.
Metaview: Explicitly does not train third-party models on customer personal data, offers a configurable retention period (2-year default), on-demand deletion with written confirmation, candidate consent handling and a DPA.
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Cogram: GDPR compliant with DPA available. No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification publicly disclosed yet.
Metaview: Holds SOC 2 Type II; no published ISO 27001 certificate was found, so it meets only one of the two baseline enterprise security certifications.
3/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Cogram: Strong fit for EU-based organisations. German jurisdiction and EU hosting address key sovereignty concerns. Suitable for consulting and financial services meetings.
Metaview: Suitable for general EU/UK business use with GDPR and consent controls; as recruiting AI handling candidate PII it touches EU AI Act high-risk territory, but it is not purpose-built or certified for heavily regulated sectors.
4/5
3/5
Total Score
21/25
18/25

Best For

Cogram iconCogram

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (BaFin, BAFM); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Metaview iconMetaview

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Cogram vs Metaview: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Cogram (Cogram, DE) scores 21/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI meeting assistant that takes notes and identifies action items. Metaview (Metaview, GB) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI recruiting platform for interview notes and hiring insights.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Cogram leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Cogram (5/5): German company with EU-based cloud infrastructure. Data processed and stored within the EU. Strong data sovereignty positioning for European customers.
Metaview (4/5): Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Cogram leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Cogram (5/5): German GmbH subject to EU/German data protection law. GDPR-native company. Not subject to US CLOUD Act or FISA.
Metaview (4/5): UK incorporated (Metaview Global Limited, England and Wales) with no US parent identified; subject to UK GDPR rather than EU/EEA jurisdiction.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Cogram (4/5): Meeting data not used for training. Clear retention policies. Users can delete meeting data. Enterprise data management controls available.
Metaview (4/5): Explicitly does not train third-party models on customer personal data, offers a configurable retention period (2-year default), on-demand deletion with written confirmation, candidate consent handling and a DPA.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 3/5.

Cogram (3/5): GDPR compliant with DPA available. No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification publicly disclosed yet.
Metaview (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II; no published ISO 27001 certificate was found, so it meets only one of the two baseline enterprise security certifications.

#### Regulatory Fit

Cogram leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Cogram (4/5): Strong fit for EU-based organisations. German jurisdiction and EU hosting address key sovereignty concerns. Suitable for consulting and financial services meetings.
Metaview (3/5): Suitable for general EU/UK business use with GDPR and consent controls; as recruiting AI handling candidate PII it touches EU AI Act high-risk territory, but it is not purpose-built or certified for heavily regulated sectors.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationCogramMetaview
GDPR DPAYesNo
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Cogram has a clear trust advantage, scoring 21/25 compared to Metaview's 18/25. Cogram particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Cogram or Metaview?

Cogram has a TrustKit score of 21/25 while Metaview scores 18/25. Cogram currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Cogram and Metaview compare on data residency?

Cogram scores 5/5 for data residency (German company with EU-based cloud infrastructure. Data processed and stored within the EU. Strong data sovereignty positioning for European customers.), while Metaview scores 4/5 (Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.).

Are Cogram and Metaview GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Cogram has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Metaview scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool