Deepgram icon

Deepgram

Fast, accurate speech-to-text and voice AI API for developers

vs
Metaview icon

Metaview

AI recruiting platform for interview notes and hiring insights

Deepgram
52%Moderate
13/25
Metaview
72%Strong
18/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionDeepgramMetaview
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Deepgram: Data is processed primarily on US infrastructure; EU-region hosting is not a standard self-serve option.
Metaview: Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.
2/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Deepgram: US-incorporated under Delaware law and subject to CLOUD Act; limited EU-specific legal mitigations advertised.
Metaview: UK incorporated (Metaview Global Limited, England and Wales) with no US parent identified; subject to UK GDPR rather than EU/EEA jurisdiction.
2/5
4/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Deepgram: Does not train on customer audio data by default; data retention controls available via API settings.
Metaview: Explicitly does not train third-party models on customer personal data, offers a configurable retention period (2-year default), on-demand deletion with written confirmation, candidate consent handling and a DPA.
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Deepgram: Holds SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance; ISO 27001 is not currently listed.
Metaview: Holds SOC 2 Type II; no published ISO 27001 certificate was found, so it meets only one of the two baseline enterprise security certifications.
3/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Deepgram: Significant due diligence required for EU regulated sectors handling sensitive audio; DPA must be negotiated separately.
Metaview: Suitable for general EU/UK business use with GDPR and consent controls; as recruiting AI handling candidate PII it touches EU AI Act high-risk territory, but it is not purpose-built or certified for heavily regulated sectors.
2/5
3/5
Total Score
13/25
18/25

Best For

Deepgram iconDeepgram

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Metaview iconMetaview

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Deepgram vs Metaview: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Deepgram (Deepgram, US) scores 13/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Fast, accurate speech-to-text and voice AI API for developers. Metaview (Metaview, GB) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI recruiting platform for interview notes and hiring insights.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Metaview leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Deepgram (2/5): Data is processed primarily on US infrastructure; EU-region hosting is not a standard self-serve option.
Metaview (4/5): Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Metaview leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Deepgram (2/5): US-incorporated under Delaware law and subject to CLOUD Act; limited EU-specific legal mitigations advertised.
Metaview (4/5): UK incorporated (Metaview Global Limited, England and Wales) with no US parent identified; subject to UK GDPR rather than EU/EEA jurisdiction.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Deepgram (4/5): Does not train on customer audio data by default; data retention controls available via API settings.
Metaview (4/5): Explicitly does not train third-party models on customer personal data, offers a configurable retention period (2-year default), on-demand deletion with written confirmation, candidate consent handling and a DPA.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 3/5.

Deepgram (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance; ISO 27001 is not currently listed.
Metaview (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II; no published ISO 27001 certificate was found, so it meets only one of the two baseline enterprise security certifications.

#### Regulatory Fit

Metaview leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Deepgram (2/5): Significant due diligence required for EU regulated sectors handling sensitive audio; DPA must be negotiated separately.
Metaview (3/5): Suitable for general EU/UK business use with GDPR and consent controls; as recruiting AI handling candidate PII it touches EU AI Act high-risk territory, but it is not purpose-built or certified for heavily regulated sectors.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationDeepgramMetaview
HIPAAYesNo
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Metaview has a clear trust advantage, scoring 18/25 compared to Deepgram's 13/25. Metaview particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Deepgram or Metaview?

Deepgram has a TrustKit score of 13/25 while Metaview scores 18/25. Metaview currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Deepgram and Metaview compare on data residency?

Deepgram scores 2/5 for data residency (Data is processed primarily on US infrastructure; EU-region hosting is not a standard self-serve option.), while Metaview scores 4/5 (Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.).

Are Deepgram and Metaview GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Deepgram has a regulatory fit score of 2/5 and Metaview scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool