Factorial HR icon

Factorial HR

Spanish HR platform with AI for payroll, time tracking, and people management

vs
Metaview icon

Metaview

AI recruiting platform for interview notes and hiring insights

Factorial HR
84%Strong
21/25
Metaview
72%Strong
18/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionFactorial HRMetaview
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Factorial HR: Data hosted in EU regions with no cross-border transfers to the US for EU customer data.
Metaview: Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.
4/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Factorial HR: Incorporated in Spain under EU law with no US parent entity; fully subject to GDPR enforcement.
Metaview: UK incorporated (Metaview Global Limited, England and Wales) with no US parent identified; subject to UK GDPR rather than EU/EEA jurisdiction.
5/5
4/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Factorial HR: Customer HR data is not used for AI model training; retention periods are configurable per customer.
Metaview: Explicitly does not train third-party models on customer personal data, offers a configurable retention period (2-year default), on-demand deletion with written confirmation, candidate consent handling and a DPA.
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Factorial HR: ISO 27001 certified; SOC 2 audit not yet publicly confirmed.
Metaview: Holds SOC 2 Type II; no published ISO 27001 certificate was found, so it meets only one of the two baseline enterprise security certifications.
3/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Factorial HR: Purpose-built for EU labour law compliance across multiple member states with native GDPR tooling.
Metaview: Suitable for general EU/UK business use with GDPR and consent controls; as recruiting AI handling candidate PII it touches EU AI Act high-risk territory, but it is not purpose-built or certified for heavily regulated sectors.
5/5
3/5
Total Score
21/25
18/25

Best For

Factorial HR iconFactorial HR

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (AEPD, CNIL); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Metaview iconMetaview

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Factorial HR vs Metaview: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Factorial HR (Factorial HR, ES) scores 21/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Spanish HR platform with AI for payroll, time tracking, and people management. Metaview (Metaview, GB) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI recruiting platform for interview notes and hiring insights.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 4/5.

Factorial HR (4/5): Data hosted in EU regions with no cross-border transfers to the US for EU customer data.
Metaview (4/5): Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Factorial HR leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Factorial HR (5/5): Incorporated in Spain under EU law with no US parent entity; fully subject to GDPR enforcement.
Metaview (4/5): UK incorporated (Metaview Global Limited, England and Wales) with no US parent identified; subject to UK GDPR rather than EU/EEA jurisdiction.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Factorial HR (4/5): Customer HR data is not used for AI model training; retention periods are configurable per customer.
Metaview (4/5): Explicitly does not train third-party models on customer personal data, offers a configurable retention period (2-year default), on-demand deletion with written confirmation, candidate consent handling and a DPA.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 3/5.

Factorial HR (3/5): ISO 27001 certified; SOC 2 audit not yet publicly confirmed.
Metaview (3/5): Holds SOC 2 Type II; no published ISO 27001 certificate was found, so it meets only one of the two baseline enterprise security certifications.

#### Regulatory Fit

Factorial HR leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Factorial HR (5/5): Purpose-built for EU labour law compliance across multiple member states with native GDPR tooling.
Metaview (3/5): Suitable for general EU/UK business use with GDPR and consent controls; as recruiting AI handling candidate PII it touches EU AI Act high-risk territory, but it is not purpose-built or certified for heavily regulated sectors.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationFactorial HRMetaview
ISO 27001YesNo
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Factorial HR has a clear trust advantage, scoring 21/25 compared to Metaview's 18/25. Factorial HR particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Factorial HR or Metaview?

Factorial HR has a TrustKit score of 21/25 while Metaview scores 18/25. Factorial HR currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Factorial HR and Metaview compare on data residency?

Factorial HR scores 4/5 for data residency (Data hosted in EU regions with no cross-border transfers to the US for EU customer data.), while Metaview scores 4/5 (Hosts all data in an AWS UK environment (United Kingdom), which is GDPR-aligned and suitable for UK and EU customers, but it is UK-only rather than an EU-region datacentre and runs on a US-headquartered cloud.).

Are Factorial HR and Metaview GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Factorial HR has a regulatory fit score of 5/5 and Metaview scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool